My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item C: Mixed-Use Centers
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 07/20/05 WS
>
Item C: Mixed-Use Centers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:19:12 PM
Creation date
7/14/2005 1:37:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/20/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chase Gardens The Chase Gardens plan was an attempt to study and implement nodal development <br />principles on the last vacant properties within one of the City's largest pockets of high density development <br />outside of its downtown. The area's 1992 refinement plan provided for more high density residential <br />development and very limited neighborhood commercial services, but the commercial services were to be <br />separated from the residential areas by Garden Way, a major collector street that is scheduled for <br />improvement. The study area boasted several properties on the National Register of Historic Places, other <br />properties eligible for listing, bike paths through bucolic orchard remnants, natural resources, and excellent <br />transit service. Not all of the study area was incorporated to the City of Eugene, so Lane County approval <br />was required. The study involved area residents and property owners in many discussions about how to <br />best accommodate growth, create a viable neighborhood commercial center, increase pedestrian and transit <br />use, and preserve important natural and historic features. <br /> <br />Several economic factors swiftly became the focus of discussions and provided the framework for the land <br />use plan that was eventually adopted. Among the factors considered were the following: <br /> <br /> The area was greatly under-served by commercial services; the node could accommodate a <br /> 9-12 acre commercial center so that residents from an area greater than the node could also <br /> avoid longer trips for basic services. <br /> If the size of the major commercial tenant, presumed to be a grocery, was restricted too <br /> much, the result would likely be a specialty store that was not affordable to the many <br /> students who populate Chase Gardens. Specialty stores may attract customers from a larger <br /> region, thereby exacerbating traffic congestion and increasing vehicle miles traveled. <br /> · To be viable, the commercial center must be relocated to increase visibility and access from <br /> Centennial Boulevard (now Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd) as well as Garden Way. <br /> · Properties located against 1-5 (but without direct access) that were previously designated for <br /> commercial development would be equally or better marketed for high density residential or <br /> mixed use development. <br /> · Residents of the historic properties did not want Garden Way street improvements, new <br /> assessments, or any intensification of traffic that the proposed development would bring. <br /> · It was too expensive and disruptive to natural resources and public park land to relocate <br /> Garden Way to a more central location or to create a more rectangular grid pattern of streets. <br /> · DLCD strongly recommended an outright prohibition of drive-through facilities throughout <br /> the node, citing OAR 660-012- 0060(7)(H), which says low intensity or land intensive uses <br /> should be "limited or prohibited." <br /> <br />During the study, a major property holder and prospective commercial developer participated in refining <br />the market analysis and site design so that, in the end, the draft nodal development plan met the nodal <br />development objectives set out at the beginning of the process. TGM grant funding, and the consultant <br />support it provided the City, expired with completion of the draft plan in June 2001. City staff drafted land <br />use code that would implement the draft plan in a simplified fashion, Metro and refinement plan <br />amendments, and plans were made to install the infrastructure improvements necessary to support the node. <br /> <br />Before the plans were adopted in November 2002, the Planning Commission, City Council, and County <br />Board of Commissioners had to wrestle with the competing images of a small "neighborhood village" that <br />had previously been used to describe nodes --~ i.e., 'mom & pop' stores with small apartments upstairs lined <br />along a quiet street --- and the large commercial needs, high traffic volumes, and market realities in the <br />Chase Gardens area. In the end, the general land use pattern proposed in the draft plan was approved, and <br />the following restrictions were added (to many others) to create the necessary neighborhood village <br />atmosphere and pedestrian comfort: <br /> <br /> 15 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.