My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Meeting w/Police Comm.
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 07/25/05 WS
>
Item B: Meeting w/Police Comm.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:14:05 PM
Creation date
7/21/2005 8:45:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/25/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Re: Civilian Review <br />June 7, 2005 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> also will identify cases appropriate for mediation or alternative dispute resolution <br /> and will coordinate such mediations or facilitated conversations. <br /> <br /> 2. Internal Affairs conducts the investigation, and the auditor provides input during <br /> the course of the investigation. After the initial investigation is completed, the <br /> auditor and perhaps a supervisor or Internal Affairs officer meets with the <br /> complainant to review the initial results of the investigation. The auditor may <br /> recommend additional investigation as a result of that interview. <br /> <br /> 3. The auditor's office will provide timely notification to complainants of the <br /> status of the investigation, including options and time frames for resolving <br /> complaints, and inform the complainant of the final decision. <br /> <br /> 4. Once the investigation is complete, the results are provided to the <br /> supervisor who makes a preliminary recommendation on adjudication. <br /> The auditor meets with the supervisor, reviews the investigation and <br /> provides input regarding the supervisor's recommendation. The <br /> recommendation then proceeds up the chain of command, and the auditor <br /> may participate at each level (including meeting with the Chief) to discuss <br /> adjudication. The final adjudication decision rests with the Chief of Police. <br /> <br /> 5. The auditor plays no role in determining what discipline, if any, should be <br /> imposed and thus does not need to review prior discipline decisions for <br /> consistency. <br /> <br /> 6. The auditor provides quarterly reports to the CRB and the Chief regarding <br /> suggestions for changes to policies or procedures. The CRB may conduct <br /> "closed case" reviews of completed investigations based on pre- <br /> established criteria. <br /> <br /> 7. If the complaint is one in which the CRB gets involved prior to adjudication, the <br /> auditor meets with the CRB, reviews the investigation, the proposed findings of <br /> fact and the proposed adjudication. The CRB may hear directly from the <br /> complainant or other involved parties, but cannot compel testimony. The CRB <br /> may make suggestions or express concems, which will be relayed to the chain of . <br /> command for potential reconsideration. Like the auditor, the CRB will have no <br /> role in determining discipline. <br /> <br /> Questions related to the auditor function and the CRB function are addressed separately <br /> as follows. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.