My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Meeting w/Police Comm.
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 07/25/05 WS
>
Item B: Meeting w/Police Comm.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:14:05 PM
Creation date
7/21/2005 8:45:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/25/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Re: Civilian Review <br /> June 7, 2005 <br /> Page 3 <br /> <br /> Il. AUDITOR FUNCTION <br /> <br /> A. Issues related to hiring of auditor <br /> <br /> The City currently contracts with an outside auditor who reviews a sampling of the <br />investigations conducted as a result of complaints against police employees. The auditor <br />conducts his/her audit after the file is closed and can have no impact on the outcome of any <br />particular case. <br /> <br /> The City could expand the role of the auditor by creating a position whose role would be <br />to audit and participate in investigations as they unfold. The position could be implemented <br />without bargaining with the Eugene Police Employees Association. See Opinion dated March 1, <br />2005. <br /> <br /> The City Council currently has no authority under the City Charter to hire or supervise an <br />auditor who will participate in the adjudication of complaints. (Eugene Charter, Chapter IV, <br />Section 16(l)(e).) Therefore, the Charter would have to be amended if the Council or its <br />designee, rather than the City Manager, is to appoint and supervise the auditor? <br /> <br /> There are also considerations with regard to whether the auditor should be a City <br />employee or an independent contractor. Oregon law provides that independent contractors must <br />comply with at least four of the following requirements: He or she must (1) carry out the <br />services at a location other than the person's residence; (2) possess business cards customary for <br />similar businesses; (3) have a business telephone listing separate from that of the person's <br />residence; (4) perform services only pursuant to a written contract; (5) perform services for two <br />or more different entities or individuals within a one-year period; or (6) assume financial <br />responsibility for defective workmanship or services through performance bonds or liability <br />insurance. ORS 670.600(8). Further, an independent contractor must be free from direction or <br />control over the means and manner of providing the labor or services, except that the City <br />Council could specify desired results. ORS 670.600(1). An individual who works full time on <br />City business, has an office at the City, uses City telephones and computers to perform his/her <br />duties and takes direction from the City Council or City Manager would not be considered an <br />independent contractor. If the Council has concems around being able to terminate the auditor <br />on short notice, the Council can make the auditor an at-will employee. <br /> <br /> ~ If the auditor reports to the City Manager, no change in the current City Charter would <br />· be required. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.