My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Meeting w/Police Comm.
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 07/25/05 WS
>
Item B: Meeting w/Police Comm.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:14:05 PM
Creation date
7/21/2005 8:45:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/25/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Re: Civilian Review <br />June 7, 2005 <br />Page 8 <br /> <br /> Three categories of personnel files are relevant in this context: <br /> <br /> a. A complaint that does not lead to discipline or criminal <br /> investigation becomes a public record as soon as the file is closed <br /> because it does not fall within any of the exemptions listed in ORS <br /> 192.501 or ORS 192.502. <br /> <br /> b. Files which involve a disciplinary action are potentially subject to <br /> the conditional exemption for disciplinary records, which would <br /> include investigations and Internal Affairs files, unless the public <br /> interest requires disclosure. ORS 192.501 (12). <br /> <br /> c. Complaints that result in criminal review are exempt from <br /> disclosure until the criminal review is completed and the case is <br /> closed. ORS 192.501(3). <br /> <br /> Although disclosure of an otherwise-exempt public record is not illegal, the City's current <br />contract with the police union requires that the City assert any applicable exemptions to protect <br />personnel records from public disclosure. (Article 37.2) Thus, implementing this model of <br />civilian review would require negotiation with the Association. See Opinion dated March 1, <br />2005. <br /> <br /> 2. Open meetings issues <br /> <br /> Under Oregon law, a "governing body" means the members of any public body which <br />consists of two or more members, with the authority to make decisions for or recommendations <br />to a public body on policy or administration. ORS 192.610(3). If the recommendations of the <br />CRB are made to the City Council or to the Police Commission, rather than to the Police Chief or <br />to the City Manager, any deliberations of the review board would be subject to Oregon's public <br />meetings law. ORS 192.630(1). Generally, unless the CRB is meeting for a social occasion or a <br />training session, the board would be meeting "for the purpose of deciding on, or deliberating <br />toward a decision" and would have to meet in open session. ORS 192.630(3). The board could <br />meet in executive session under two circumstances: (1) to discuss records that fall under the <br />public records exemptions cited above, or (2) to discuss advice from an attorney. <br /> <br /> It is likely that the CRB could meet in executive session to discuss open "community <br />impact" investigations prior to their adjudication, because we may assert that those investigatory <br />files remain exempt until it is determined whether or not discipline will result, and then whether <br />the conditional exemption applies. However, any record related to investigations and discipline <br />may be used in an arbitration or in litigation, even if the record would normally be exempt from <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.