My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 2-20-19 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2019
>
02-20-19
>
Agenda Packet 2-20-19 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2019 5:16:43 PM
Creation date
2/8/2019 5:13:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City_Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
City_Council_Meeting_Type
Work Session
City_Council_Meeting_Date
2/20/2019
City_Council_Effective_Date
2/20/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ADU Guidance ‐2‐ March 2018 <br />Guidance by Topic The purpose of the following guidance is to help cities and <br />counties implement the ADU requirement in a manner that meets <br />the letter and spirit of the law: to create more housing in Oregon <br />by removing barriers to development. <br />Number of Units The law requires subject cities and counties to allow “at least one <br />accessory dwelling unit for each detached single‐family dwelling.” <br />While local governments must allow one ADU where required, <br />DLCD encourages them to consider allowing two units. For <br />example, a city or county could allow one detached ADU and <br />allow another as an attached or interior unit (such as a basement <br />conversion). Because ADUs blend in well with single‐family <br />neighborhoods, allowing two units can help increase housing <br />supply while not having a significant visual impact. Vancouver, BC <br />is a successful example of such an approach. <br />Siting Standards In order to simplify standards and not create barriers to <br />development of ADUs, DLCD recommends applying the same or <br />less restrictive development standards to ADUs as those for other <br />accessory buildings. Typically that would mean that an ADU could <br />be developed on any legal lot or parcel as long as it met the <br />required setbacks and lot coverage limits; local governments <br />should not mandate a minimum lot size for ADUs. So that lot <br />coverage requirements do not preclude ADUs from being built on <br />smaller lots, local governments should review their lot coverage <br />standards to make sure they don’t create a barrier to <br />development. To address storm water concerns, consider limits to <br />impermeable surfaces rather than simply coverage by structures. <br />In addition, any legal nonconforming structure (such as a house or <br />outbuilding that doesn’t meet current setback requirements) <br />should be allowed to contain, or be converted to, an ADU as long <br />as the development does not increase the nonconformity. <br />Design Standards Any design standards required of ADUs must be clear and <br />objective (ORS 197.307[4]). Clear and objective standards do not <br />contain words like “compatible” or “character.” With the <br />exception of ADUs that are in historic districts and must follow the <br />historic district regulations, DLCD does not recommend any <br />special design standards for ADUs. Requirements that ADUs <br />match the materials, roof pitch, windows, etc. of the primary <br />dwelling can create additional barriers to development and <br />sometimes backfire if the design and materials of the proposed <br />February 20, 2019, Work Session – Item 1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.