My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20258
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2002 No. 20242-20273
>
Ordinance No. 20258
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:43:58 PM
Creation date
7/21/2005 3:58:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
7/8/2002
Document_Number
20258
Author
James D. Torrey
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
262
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ST EU~NE PARKC~AY ~FIED P~ECT--C%~',I$!STEN~ VQTH THE STAT~DE P~NING ~L$ MD TP, ANSP(XRTATION ~NNING RULE <br /> <br />The Southern and Southern (Modified) Alternatives would result in significant adverse impacts to <br />threatened and endangered species~ While the Southern Alternative would not displace any T&E <br />species, would be located within 50 metem of over 235 Kincaid's Lupine plants~ High-speed traffic <br />along the fatuity would pose a substantial threat to the federally proposed endangered Fender's blue <br />butteffiy~ which is attracted to the Lupine as a host plant for the butterfly larvae~ ~lae Southern <br />(Modified) Altemative would displace 19 plants of Willamette Daisy and 12 clumps of White-topped <br />Aster. <br /> <br />Becaus? other alternatives have significantly reduced potential adverse impacts to T&E species in <br />comparison to the Southern alternatives, the Southern Alternative and Southern (Modified) <br />Alternative are not reasonable alternatives~ The protection of T&E species is a paramount <br />consideration, as reflected bo~ by the applicable federal and state endangered species legislation and <br />by the decision m reconsider alternatives m the Approved Design that would reduce overall adverse <br />environmental impacts~ Where other alternatives are available with significantly less adverse impacts <br />to T&E species, these alternatives become unreasonable. <br /> <br />The Southern alternatives also are not reasonable because of the substantial damage they would do to <br />the implementation and ~ntegfity of the West Eugene WetIan& Plan and to developing industrial <br />businesses in the affected area, and because of their yew high and continually growing costs. Placing <br />these impacts ~n perspective requires some background discussion of the WEW£. <br /> <br />The West Eugene ~dands Plan was developed following discover), and inventory of a concentration <br />of wetlands in western Eugene ~n the late 1980s. Those wetlands coincided with areas that had been <br />designated by the City of Eugene and acknowledged by LCDC for industrial development. At the <br />time of the wetl~ds d~scovery, industrial investment and development already was proceeding. By <br />then, the City akeady had expended over $12,000,000 in infras~cture to the West Eugene area to <br />support such development. ?rivate inves'tmem included over $900~000 by Spectra Physics for wetland <br />mitigation to develop ks industrial property in this areafis It became clear to the affected <br />governments, regulatory agencies and property owners that the conflicts needed to be addressed ~n a <br /> ~ve and timely manner to achieve certainty in the planning process, protect wetlands, and <br />to provide greater security ~br the C~ty and developers in making investment decisions. <br /> <br />The resuk was a study culminating with the adoption of the WEWP in 1992. Today, the WEWP <br />provides the basis for wetlands management in the West Eugene area. The plan was developed to <br />balance the City's acknowledged need for economic development with the protection and restoration <br />ora wetland and waterway system, as well ~ to protect natural diversity. The plan ~ncludes goals and <br />policies for protection, enhancement, mitigation and development~ <br /> <br />The WEWP ~dentifies approximately 1,307 acres of wetlands in the West Eugene area. Through the <br />coordination effo~ between the City of Eugene, Lane County, LCOG and affected state and federal <br />agencies~ 1,109 of these acres have been designated for protection or restoration, while 288 wetland <br />acres'remain available for development The 1,307 acres ~nclude about 600 acres initially designated <br />for industrial use, of which 485 acres now are identified for protection or restoration. <br /> <br />.Over $7 m~llion of federal funding h~ been invested in the implementation of the ~rEWP to datefis <br />In addition to the ~deral funding, there h~ been considerable invesWnent from private property <br />omers located in the area west of Beltline Highway, north of West 1 lth Avenu~, and south of the <br /> <br />65 S~ The Nature Conserva~m¥ Report No 2 (September/October 1993). The Spectra Physics site is now o~upied by PSC <br /> <br />66 ©n August 26, !t999~ dudng a tour of the West Eugene weUands area hosted by LCOG, Senator Gordon Sre~h pledged an <br /> i~es~nt ~o ~p[e~n~ ~he ~t4/P~ Also the ~dera[ Envimnmenta~ Protection Agen~ contributed <br />$50;~ 10 flhe deveBp~n! of the ~ to Use ~asa nationa~ ~se Study in how wet~and pmtem~on and e~mOmic <br />development both mn ~ a~mmodated ~n an u~an environment <br /> <br />EXHIBIT O-1 - F~ND~NGS 38 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.