Laserfiche WebLink
WEST EUGENE PARK3NAY MODtFIED PROJECT--CONSISTENCY WiTH THE STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING RULE <br /> <br />Farther west, it would displace two wetland/pond/vernal pools between the current end of Roosevelt <br />Boulevard and the Amazon Channel.?6 These are significant adverse environmental impacts. <br /> <br />Moreover, the Roosevelt Extension Alternative would add a new barrier that would further fragment <br />the wedands. In contrast, the other alternatives would be parallel and adjacent to the railroad which <br />already creates a barrier and fragments the wetlands. <br /> <br />While the environmental impacts of the Approved Design are less severe than those resulting from <br />the Roosevelt Extension Alternative, they are still substantial and significantly more adverse than <br />those resulting from the Modified Project. Regarding high value wetlands, the Approved Design <br />would adversely affect 11.27 hectares of high value wetlands, compared to 6.4 hectares for the <br />Modified Project. Regarding T&E species, the Approved Design would eliminate 22 Willamette <br />Daisy plants and 17 clumps of White-topped Aster and eliminate habitat for the Western Pond Turtle, <br />while the Modified Project would eliminate just three clumps of White-topped Aster and cause only <br />temporary construction impacts to the Western Pond Turtle habitat.77 <br /> <br />The Green Hill Road Flyover Alternative also would have much more significant adverse <br />environmental effects that the Modified Project. While this alignment follows the Modified Project <br />east of Green Hill Road, it shifts to the Approved Design via the flyover at Green Hill Road. The <br />flyover would require approximately 4.25 hectares of fill south of the railroad tracks, in a rare <br />Willamette Wet Prairie wetland area identified as a very important ecological resoume?s The fill <br />-would fragment a large patch of wet prairie wetlands, cutting the surface hydrology connection that <br />now exists. Overall, the fill would impact considerably more protected plants than the Modified <br />Project. <br /> <br />From the standpoint of environmental impacts, the Modified Project clearly has significantly fewer <br />adverse impacts than the other three alternatives. <br /> <br />Energy impacts <br />There is no significant discernible difference in energy impacts among the four alternatives. All fbur <br />alternatives would establish a four lane, limited access highway that would improve access to the <br />West Eugene ~ndustrial area and relieve the substantial traffic congestion along West 11 th Avenue. <br />Motorized vehicles traveling along any of these alternatives would consmne gasoline. On the other <br />hand, facilkafing the smooth flow of traffic at acceptable levels of service would help conserYe fuel <br />by avoiding the wasteful burning of fuel at intersections already above capacity or expected to exceed <br />capacity during the planning period. <br /> <br />Overall ~mpact Analysis <br />For the reasons stated above~ the net adverse impacts resulting from the Modified Project would not <br />be "significantly more adverse" than would result from the same proposal being located at any of the <br />other three locations requiring goal exceptions. Indeed, compared to the other alternatives, the net <br />adverse impacts resulting from the Mod[fled Project appear to be significantly less adverse, due <br />primarily to differences in environmental impacts. <br /> <br />76 Alternatives Memorandum, Table 4. <br />77 The Willamette Valley Daisy is classified as a federal "candidate" species and a state listed endangered species. The <br />VVhite-topped Aster is c~ass~ed as a federal "s~es of ~n~m' and a state ~isted threatened species. The western pond <br />tuA~e ~s classified as a federal s~c~es of ~n~rn and a state "sens~ive ~iti~t" spades. SDE~S at 3-10. <br />78 Willame~e wet prakie wetland is ve~ rare, with only about 0.1 per, ut remaining. The resour~ provides high biologi~l <br />divem~y and has high s~n~mmn~ for threatened and endangered species. See, e.g., SDEIS at 3~, 3-9; Land Use Technical <br />Re~d at 86. <br /> <br />EXHIBIT C-I - FINDINGS 46 <br /> <br /> <br />