Laserfiche WebLink
WEST ELKT~NE PARKWAY ~FJED PROJ ECT~-4X)NSISTENC:-f W~TH THE STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS AND TRANSPOP~TATION PLANNING RULE <br /> <br />In addition to the adverse impacts identified for the Green Hill Road Flyover Alternative, it also is <br />noted that the elevated structure required to cross the railroad tracks would result in safety hazards <br />due to rotating super-elevation rates. In turn, this could result in erratic vehicle operation as drivers <br />attempt to negotiate the curves, especially at night and during wet and icy pavement conditions. <br />Potential ponding of highway runoff resulting from the nonstandard design would also present a <br />hazard. See Alternatives Memorandum. For these reasons, the Green Hill Road Flyover Alternative is <br />not an operationally feasible alternative, <br /> <br />Finally and as previously noted, because goal exceptions were previously approved and <br />acknowledged for the Approved Design, it is likely that the Approved Design and Green Hill Flyover <br />alternatives are more properly addressed under OAR 660-012-0070(5) (alternatives not requiring an <br />exception) than under OAR 660-012-0070(7). For that reason, the discussion of those alternatives in <br />this section are incorporated by reference into the discussion under OAR 660-012-0070(5). For the <br />reasons explained in this section, the Approved Design and Green Hill Flyover alternatives cannot <br />reasonably accommodate the needed transportation facility because of their significant adverse <br />impacts to high value wetlands and T&E species. <br /> <br />Compliance with OAR 660-012-0070(8), ORS 97.732(1)(c)(D) Goal 2 <br />and OAR 660-004-0020(2)(d) <br />OAR 660-012-0070(8) provides that to comply wkh Goal 2 Pa~ II(c)(4), the exception must describe <br />the adverse effects ~at the proposed transpo~afion ~mprovement [s l~kely to have on the su~ound[ng <br />rural lands and land uses, including increased traffic ~d pressure for nonf~ or h~ghway oriented <br />development on me~ made more accessible by the transpomfion ~mprovement. ~is section also <br />requires, as pa~ of the exception, fac~liW design and land use measures which m~nim~ze accessibility <br />of rural lands from the proposed tmnspo~fion fac~lky and suppo~ continued rural use of surrounding <br />lands. <br /> <br />Similarly, OAR 660-004-0020(2)(d) requires the exception to explain how the proposed use is <br />compatible with other adjacent uses or will be rendered compatible through measures designed to <br />reduce adverse impacts, As used in this section, "compatible" is not intended as an absolute term <br />meaning no interference or adverse impacts of any type with adjacent uses. <br /> <br />The compatibility of the Modified Project with surrounding rural lands is described in the <br />Compatibility Memorandum, incorporated herein by reference. Those findings are summarized below. <br />Overall, the impacts resulting from the location of this facility' on rural land are minimized as a <br />consequence of the proposed location of the facility within an area where substantial acreage is not <br />available for development due to environmental constraints, and through the limked access design of <br />the facility that discourages increased traffic in rural areas. <br /> <br />Because of its location immediately north of the railroad tracks, the Modified Project will not create <br />any new parcels or result in any uneconomic remnants, thereby reducing farm impacts, Moreover, of <br />the approximately 27 acres needed to be taken to accommodate the project outside the UGB, only 3.1 <br />acres involve privately ovmed lands, and none of those acres are part of commercial farms. <br />Accordingly, an3' impact on the commemial farm enterprise in the area is minimal. <br /> <br />The Modified Project will affect accesses to properties along Goble Lane. To maintain local access <br />and use compatibility~ Goble Lane would be realigned to the north and extended westward about <br />1,300 feet to near the western end of the project. The existing Highway 126/Goble Lane access would <br />be closed and a new intersection created at an existing driveway at the western end of the proposed <br />Goble Lane extension. The closure of the existing Goble Lane access and its relocation to the new <br />intersection will help limit local access to the adjoining rural area, thereby reducing adverse farm <br />impacts and maintaining compatibility. Likewise, the design feature closing direct access onto West <br /> <br />EXIqlB~T ~l - F~ND)NGS 47 <br /> <br /> <br />