Laserfiche WebLink
The first condition will be addressed by adjusting both base year and future year model ou~ut. <br /> will <br /> g~ssUre <br /> that changes in future year forecasts are not the result of imProvementS in t~e <br />model. <br /> <br />The second cond/fion will be addressed by uskng TPR definition of "m~xed-use,,p edestfi <br />~endly' development contained k~ TPR Section 0060 (7)(a)-(b) dealing with Plan and Lmad Use <br />~egUl~tion Ame~adments. This Section of the TPR iden~/h~ t~ follov g characteristics of <br /> mixed-use, pedestr/an-fiSendly' development- <br /> <br />A concenmfion of a met3, of land uses kn a well~£med area, including the follow~ng: <br />(i) mechum to tfigh density residential development (12 or more milts per acre); <br /> <br /> (fi) offices or office bnildmgs; <br /> (~) retail stores and services; <br /> (iV) reStammnts; and~ <br /> (v) public open space or private open space which is available for <br /> park or plaza. <br />(B) Generally ~nclude cMc or culml uses; <br />(C) A core commercial area where multi-story buildings are perm/tted; <br />(D) Bu~ld~ngs and bu/ld/ng enl~ances oriented to Streets; <br />(E) Street <br /> <br />public use, such as a <br /> <br />safe and conveniently accessible <br /> <br />(F) <br /> <br />street cross~gs~ street trees, <br /> <br />(G) <br />(H) Lhnk or do <br /> <br /> ~ or land ex~nsive uses, such as most mdus~Sal uses, <br />and drive-through services. <br /> <br />The thkd cond/fion Lnvolved resta~mg the interkn benchmarks for dwelling units and employment <br />in nodes such that the pementages are of an interkn total rather than the ulfirnate total. Table 7 <br />provides these performance measures calculated in both ways~ <br /> <br />Development of TransPlan's Alternative Performance Measures <br /> <br />Multiple objectives are set forth in the TPR for demonstrating compliance ~ reduced reliance on <br />the a~to, ~n~rease Lq the availability or convenience of altern~iive ~odes, and hncrease ~ the use <br />of alternative s~ The strongest way to measure cOmPliance with the TPR is through a <br />framework of multiple perfonnance measures. As well, the complex knterrelationsh/p among the <br />p an s set of goals, objechves, pohc~es, and suggested nnplementatmn measures calls for <br />consideration of multiple performance measures in assessing plan progress. <br /> <br />An lng p~se of the TPR is to promote the development of plans that lead to a reduced <br />rel~ance On the automobile. The alternative performance measures are meant to provide an <br />objective k~dic~tor of the ~Pmvement ~n th~ transportation system ackdeved through <br />hnplementafion of the plan. In particular, k is knportant to measure the knptementafion of and <br /> <br />TransPlan ~4~m~ <br /> <br />Chapter 4~ Page 18 <br /> <br />xhibit A - Page 63 <br />ransPlan Amendments <br /> <br /> <br />