My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20258
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2002 No. 20242-20273
>
Ordinance No. 20258
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:43:58 PM
Creation date
7/21/2005 3:58:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
7/8/2002
Document_Number
20258
Author
James D. Torrey
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
262
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
response to those elements of the plan that most directly contribute to reduced reliance on the <br />automobile. FOr example, Bu~s R~pid Transit and Nodal Development are key elements of <br />TransPlan that cOntribUte to reduced reliance on the automobile. <br /> <br />The framework of alternative measures should therefore include performance measures that <br /> e both the supply (plan ~lementation) and demand (travel or ~et response) for <br />~nsportation in thee E~ne-Sp~gfield, area. In addition~ ~here possible, thes~ mea;ures should <br />provide a dkect indication of the regions progress ha imPlementin-g ke~y elements h~ the plan that <br />contribute to reduced reliance on the auto. ~s approac~ ties the ~lan S kmplementation effort to <br />expected reSUlts. Table 7 Pro¼des an indication ff~} each measUr~ as to its ~e (plan <br />irr~plementation or trave t responSe). <br /> <br />Summary Assessment of TransPlants TPR Compliance <br /> <br /> a~ve <br />One of the maha challenge~ present ha deVelop~nt of~tternative ~aeasures is demons~ating why <br />~ how a p~cular target rePresents a "significanf' change ha reliance on the auto. The term <br /> s gmficant ~s haherently subjective. What m s~gmficant from one perspective can well be <br /> s~gmficant from another perspective. <br /> <br /> gone to <br /> on the anto. The more <br /> (triplhag) m <br />gas tax;)to restrictions on <br /> <br />These alternative plan concepts were presented to the region's plarming commissions and elected. <br />officials ~ the form of a Decision Package. The feedback from these groups had/cared that there <br />was considerable interest in an overall a~proach that integrated land ~se, s~stem knprovements~ <br />and de managemenL They focused on sUpport ofno~lal development, bus raPid transit and <br />expanded vol TDM as key strategies to be pursued ha TransPlan. However, there was no <br />policy4evel support for TDM pricing measures, constra~g development, or mandatory TDM <br />techniques. <br /> <br /> pe proposed alternative performance measures assessed below rely heavily on the <br /> lementation of the key strategies identified in the prOCess desc~bed abo;ce. <br /> <br />TransPlan <br /> <br />Exhibit A - Page 64 <br />TransPlan Amendments <br /> <br />Chapter 4~ Page 19 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.