My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 06/08/05 WS
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2005
>
CC Minutes - 06/08/05 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:29:05 AM
Creation date
7/22/2005 8:44:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
property for the appraised amount, but the offer was declined. Mr. Medlin said the City had indicated to the <br />property owner it was still interested in purchasing the property. The owner wanted to examine the <br />development potential of the property before further discussions with the City. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy called on the council for questions and comments. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Taylor, Mr. Medlin said City staff believed it had authorization to <br />proceed with the acquisition given the council's past actions related to the Stream Corridor Acquisition <br />program and the ridgeline trail acquisition program. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said people continued to say south Eugene had too many parks; but the reports from Mr. Medlin <br />and consultant Eben Fodor, who was commissioned by area residents, indicated that Ms. Ortiz's ward, <br />Ward 1, had the most parks of any ward. She acknowledged that south Eugene had more community-type <br />parks and large open spaces. Ms. Taylor believed significant natural resources needed to be preserved <br />where they existed. She maintained those areas belonged to everyone in the city, not just those who live near <br />them. They contribute to the community's beauty and health. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said there were residents willing to help the City find the money to purchase the property and she <br />thought the City should work with them. She said the area in question was pristine but unprotected, as noted <br />by Mr. Medlin himself in a grant application. The property had never been logged and it contained two <br />stream channels, wetlands, old growth maple trees, and Douglas fir trees. It was important for water quality <br />and storm water retention. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly thanked staff and the residents of the area for providing the council with additional information. <br />He observed that the acquisition would also support the metropolitan Rivers to Ridges Plan and was <br />supported for that reason by the Lane Council of Governments and Lane County Parks Department. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said information provided to the council suggested that long-term maintenance costs for the <br />stream corridors on the site were likely to be less than if the parcel was developed, due to the change in <br />impervious areas and modifications to the vegetation. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly wanted staff to keep talking to the property owner and neighbors and to develop a public-private <br />partnership that would lead to protection of the area in question. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman expressed appreciation for the information provided by staff and the residents, which she <br />believed established that the property in question was valuable. She said the only gap in the materials she <br />perceived was a lack of discussion about best management practices and green infrastructure approaches. <br />She saw the acquisition as an asset in that regard. She wanted City staff to pursue the property acquisition <br />with renewed vigor. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman determined from Mr. Medlin that the State grant funding the City sought for the purchase was <br />an annual grant, depending on funding available from the federal government. Ms. Bettman asked if the <br />City could reapply for the grant funding from the State this year. Mr. Medlin said he would if he believed <br />the City had a willing seller. The grant did not require a willing seller, but it did require the City to expend <br />the grant award within a certain time period, which usually required the cooperation of the property owner. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 8, 2005 Page 2 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.