Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Pap6 believed the trustee of the previous owners would disagree with the staff summary of the City's <br />attempts to purchase the property. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap6 determined from Mr. Medlin that the City purchased the original 54 acres because of the Stream <br />Corridor Acquisition Program and because of its proximity to the ridgeline trail. There were multiple <br />objectives for the purchase. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Mr. Pap6, Mr. Medlin confirmed that staff asked an appraiser and <br />engineering firm to look at the development potential of the property. Mr. Pap6 asked if 110 housing units <br />could be accommodated on the property. Acting Planning Division Manager Steve Nystrom did not know <br />what was possible at this time. He believed the current zoning district would allow closer to 200 units, but <br />what was realistic could differ from that estimate. Mr. Medlin added that the City had hoped for an <br />appraisal that supported the higher asking price of $600,000 and did not receive that. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap6 said he was not contending the south hills were %ver-parked" but he contended other areas of the <br />community were ;;under-parked." He said that he did not object if someone purchased the property and <br />donated it to the City. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap6 determined from Mr. Medlin that the City had generally achieved its goals for acres in the <br />ridgeline trail system but had about $150,000 left for property acquisitions. Mr. Medlin called the council's <br />attention to a map of City park land that illustrated the extent of ridgeline trail acquisitions and demon- <br />strated some of the remaining gaps in the system. He believed there was a need for further acquisitions. <br />Mr. Pap6 agreed, but said the City needed community parks in the north and it would take even more <br />funding to get that done. He wanted to see parks and open space purchases in that area. <br /> <br />Mr. Medlin noted that of the bond proceeds, there was also money for a neighborhood park in Santa Clara. <br />He concurred, in response to a follow-up question from Mr. Pap6, that funding would not both buy and <br />develop a park in that area. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor said he had not heard anyone say the property was not of interest if it could be acquired. <br />However, he questioned whether there were the resources to purchase it at this time. No one seemed to <br />know what the price would be. He said there appeared to be continuing interest in acquisition on the part of <br />the council. He said the grant application must be a package. He thought it would be premature to make a <br />motion at this time and suggested the council let the process ;;play out." <br /> <br />Ms. Solomon agreed with the remarks of Mr. Pryor. She was concerned about the City's purchase of <br />property that was currently subject to property taxes being taken off the tax rolls at a time such revenues <br />were needed. She preferred to continue with the proposed stormwater acquisition. She suggested staff <br />continue negotiations with the property owner and that the neighbors purchase the property and donate it to <br />the City if they wanted. She also suggested that if the City purchased the property, it give up an equal <br />amount of land someplace else to ensure that revenues were not reduced, thus further eroding the City's <br />ability to provide desired services to citizens. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling also supported the acquisition of the property. He suggested the City continue to work on the <br />acquisition before it made a grant application to the State for funding. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 8, 2005 Page 3 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />