Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit A <br /> <br />expressed further in OAR 660-023-0240(2): "The requirements of Goals 15, ]6, ] 7 and <br />]9 shall supersede requirements of this division for natural resources that are also <br />subject to and regulated under one or more of those goals. ' This relationship is not <br />optional as the imperative verb makes perfectly clear. The exception process required for <br />the proposed use in the Greenway is similar to the process used for evaluating Goal 5 <br />resources: both require an economic, social, environmental, and energy consequences <br />evaluation to determine if the competing value, in this case highway use, should be <br />allowed. That evaluation is examined later in these findings under OAR 660-004-0020 <br />Exception Requirements. The requirements of Goal 5 are met by the standards of the <br />Willame~te ~ver Greenway; by the four factors of Goal 2, Part H(c) Exception <br />Requirements; by the conclusions evaluating "significant adverse effect on the ~een-way <br />values of the sim" under OAR 660-004-0022(5); and by the conditions of approval <br />imposed by the Springfield Planning Commission in approving a Discretionary Use <br />request ~br the detour bridge. <br /> <br />Goal 6 - Air~ Water and Land Resources Quality <br /> <br />To maintain and improve the quality of the air, water and land resources of the <br />state. <br /> <br />This goal is primarily concerned with compliance with federal and state enviromental <br />quality statutes, and how this compliance is achieved as development proceeds in <br />relationship m air sheds, river basins and land resources. This proposed exception will <br />allow an existing, necessary transportation facility to be replaced without disruption to I- <br />5 travel As the evaluation under OAR 660-004-0020 demonstrates, the alternative to the <br />detour bridge is routing a volume and type of traffic onto county roads and cky streets not <br />designed for such trips. The ensuing de~adation to the air quality along these alternate <br />routes caused by unmanageable congestion would be a direct contradiction of the purpose <br />of~his goal. This goal is met by the proposed exception. <br /> <br />Goal 7 - Areas Subject to Natural Disasters and Hazards <br /> <br />To protect life and property from natural disasters and hazards. <br /> <br />All sites within Springfield subject to these hazards (floodplain, erosion, landslides, <br />earthquakes, weak foundation soils) are inventoried through a variety of sources and <br />regulated by the Springfield Development Code, Article 26 HILLSIDE <br />DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT; Article 27 FLOODPLA~ OVERLAY <br />DISTRICT; A~icle 31 SITE PLAN REVIEW; and Article 32 PU~BL~C AN3D PRIVATE <br />/MPROVEMENTS. Bridge support structures and fill within the floodplain of the <br />Willamette will require a Floodplain fill permit consistent with FEMA regulations. No <br />other hazards are present. This goal is met by the application of Art/cie 27. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br /> <br />