My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20292
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2003 No. 20274-20306
>
Ordinance No. 20292
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:44:43 PM
Creation date
7/26/2005 6:02:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
7/14/2003
Document_Number
20292
Author
James D. Torrey
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit A <br /> <br />similar to and a part of the adjoining Whilamut natural area. This right-of-way was not <br />intended to promote Willamette Greenway objectives in as much as it preceded the <br />Willamette Greenway Goal by 20 or more years. The Whilamut natural area is point on <br />consistent with the Greenway values intended to be protected by the Greenway Goal. <br />The relationship of the right-of-way, the proposed bridge, the Whilamut natural area and <br />the Greenway values is now, and will remain, a matter of constantly balancing two <br />exclusive purpose uses of significant contrast. It is no wonder an exception is necessary. <br />What will make these circumstances tolerable is the successful effort made by ODO% <br />Willamalane and the City of Springfield to execute conditions of approval imposed by <br />the Springfield Pl~ng Commission in its decision to approve a Discretionary Use to <br />allow an intensification of use within the Willamette River Greenway (detour bridge)~ <br />Those conditions include the following: <br /> <br />1) The staffs of ODOT, City of Springfield and Willamalane will jointly prepare a <br />construction management plan that will address, at a minimum, ingress and egress to the <br />site; hours of operation; noise, dust vibration and lighting; run-off and hydrology; and <br />bicycle and pedestrian safety in the construction area. <br />2) ODOT, City of Springfield, Willamalane and other appropriate state and ~kderal <br />agencies will jointly prepare a habitat protection plan that will mitigate any identified <br />adverse impacts to the Whilamut natural area caused during and after bridge construction. <br />3) ODOT, City of Springfield and Willamalane staff will jointly prepare a restoration <br />plan for the area knpacted by the temporary bridge, including a "return to equal or better <br />than" cmn:ent condition as a baseline; elimination of invasives; plant salvage; and a <br />monitoring schedule to assess on-going success. A member of the Citizens Planning <br />Committee wilt be asked to participate in these efforts in an advisory capacity. <br /> <br />These conditions are intended to mitigate adverse effects; protect as much of this <br />resource as possible during construction; and restore as much of this resource as possible <br />after construction and deconstruction of the detour bridge. The Whilamut natural area <br />has been included in park plans since the adoption of the 1973 Alton Baker Park Land <br />Use Plan~ ~ts successor, the 1986 Alton Baker Park Master Plan, and the current <br />operational plan, the 1995 East Alton Baker Park Plan. Each iteration of these planning <br />efforts designated Whilamut as a natural habitat site of combined riparian and upland <br />wildhfe values. <br /> <br />During the preparation of the Natural Resources Special Study in the late 1980's~ a draft <br />inventory was prepared of metropolitan area resource sites based on wildlife habkat <br />values. The Whilamut, then known as the East Gate Woodlands, received the highest <br />score in the metro area. The City's current Goal 5 preliminary inventory categorizes the <br />WTrfilamut with the same high value as preceding studies and evaluations. While the <br />City's inventory has not yet been officially adopted as required by Goal 5, there is littte <br />doubt that the Whitamut will be considered anything less than the highly valuable <br />resource ~t embodies. <br /> <br />Ctearly, the co~mection between the purpose of Goal 5 and the purpose of the Greenway <br />values are mutually supportive and in many instances overlap. This commonality is <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.