Laserfiche WebLink
2018 Incident Reviews, Inquiries, Policy Complaints, and Service Complaints <br />Appendix B Page 14 of 48 <br />Received <br />Date <br />Closed <br />Date <br />Time <br />Open <br />(days) <br />Classification Summary Outcome <br />4/2/18 6/1/18 59 Policy RP was unhappy with poor costumer <br />service about a burglary she <br />experienced. <br />Sgt. reviewed body cam, police reports and found that the case <br />was handled correctly, in that with no leads or evidence to <br />identify a suspect it was not turned over to a detective. A <br />supplemental report was also done after further information was <br />brought forth. Officer did a thorough investigation. <br />4/20/18 5/17/18 27 Courtesy RP was concerned about a call for <br />service in which her son was having a bi- <br />polar episode and officers used excessive <br />force, laughed and mocked her son. <br />Review of body cam show RP's son was unconscious on the floor, <br />and an officer used a knee to press into his back to keep him <br />prone only when the son came to and tried to get up before <br />medics were finished examining him. The force used was not <br />excessive. The conversation that RP believed was mocking her <br />son was not; the involved employee was speaking about an in- <br />service training and not talking or laughing about RP's son. <br />4/23/18 5/29/18 36 Performance RP was unhappy with an officer <br />threatening her teenage daughter with a <br />search, when she and friends were just <br />walking by where officers were making <br />an arrest. <br />Sgt. learned that it was a campus monitor who made the <br />comment to the girls, and not an EPD officer. Arrangements were <br />made for the officer and the monitor to speak with the girls. <br />4/18/18 6/1/18 43 Inquiry RP reported various conspiracy theories <br />related to officers involving landlord <br />trafficking and being abducted remotely. <br />Sgt. reviewed the police contact with RP and found that the <br />officer's report was factual, and he acted within the scope of his <br />authority. Sgt. spoke with RP about this report and provided <br />information on social services to RP. <br />4/26/18 4/30/18 4 Inquiry RP reported that EPD would not take his <br />report about how unhappy he was with <br />a tattoo and the skin reaction he had. RP <br />feels he was poisoned. <br />Lt. explained to RP that at this time there was no reportable <br />criminal activity that RP was describing. If in the future, more <br />information become available, such as blood tests showing a <br />probable cause for his symptoms he should re-contact EPD. <br />4/25/18 6/1/18 36 Policy RP was unhappy that an officer harassed <br />his employees selling things from his <br />booth that he had a permit for. <br />Cpt. reviewed the incident and found that RP had the wrong type <br />of permit for the type of booth. The interaction with the officer <br />and the employees was described by a witness as unremarkable, <br />with the officer being informative and professional. RP has since <br />obtained the correct permit. <br />June 19, 2019, Work Session – Item 2