Laserfiche WebLink
2018 Incident Reviews, Inquiries, Policy Complaints, and Service Complaints <br />Appendix B Page 19 of 48 <br />Received <br />Date <br />Closed <br />Date <br />Time <br />Open <br />(days) <br />Classification Summary Outcome <br />5/29/18 7/10/18 41 Service Level RP was upset that an officer did not <br />make an arrest after a dispute with her <br />partner. RP felt it was a domestic <br />assault. <br />Review of the officer's report and body cam found that the <br />officer did not have enough probable cause to make an arrest at <br />the time of the incident. Sgt. spoke with RP and explained the <br />governing OR statute. <br />5/29/18 7/2/18 33 Performance RP reported that her son was told that <br />an inmate being released from jail had a <br />stolen gun in his belongings. <br />A review of ICV showed the arresting officer documenting the <br />contents of the bag belonging to the inmate, no gun was found. <br />Lt. contacted RP with the findings. <br />5/30/18 6/18/18 18 Service Level RP reported that a call taker would not <br />take a report about an incident in which <br />his son was threatened downtown. <br />Supervisor found that the caller should have been allowed to <br />give a phone report about the incident, even though an officer <br />would not have been sent out. The call taker a new employee <br />will be coached about the call. Supervisor spoke with RP about <br />her findings. <br />5/30/18 6/1/18 1 Other <br />Dismissed: <br />Alternate <br />Remedy <br />RP was upset he got a park violation.Dismissed: Alternate Remedy <br />5/31/18 7/10/18 40 Performance RP was unhappy with how an officer <br />handled a situation in which he was <br />bitten by a pit bull in his neighborhood. <br />Sgt. found after reviewing body cam that the animal had not <br />bitten. RP was provided information about how to file a civil <br />action if he felt the need. The incident was documented and <br />forwarded to animal control. <br />5/31/18 6/4/18 4 Incident Review <br />Dismissed: <br />Other <br />RP alleged use of force by an officer. Review of body cam by Auditor's Office found no force used in <br />the incident. Dismissed: Other <br />5/31/18 6/18/18 18 Inquiry RP was unhappy that an off-duty officer <br />blocked her car in and threatened to give <br />her a citation for following to close. <br />Sgt. learned that the officer had been tailgated by RP and then <br />watched her tailgate another car in front of him which caused <br />her to have to drive into the median when the other driver <br />stopped quickly. Officers, even off-duty, have discretion on <br />whether to give citations, and the officer only intended to warn <br />RP about her driving. No policy violation found. Sgt. spoke with <br />RP. <br />June 19, 2019, Work Session – Item 2