Laserfiche WebLink
2018 Incident Reviews, Inquiries, Policy Complaints, and Service Complaints <br />Appendix B Page 28 of 48 <br />Received <br />Date <br />Closed <br />Date <br />Time <br />Open <br />(days) <br />Classification Summary Outcome <br />7/30/18 8/1/18 1 Performance <br />Dismissed: <br />Outside <br />Jurisdiction <br />RP reported two officers who failed to <br />help a motorist in distress. <br />Dismissed: Outside Jurisdiction <br />7/25/18 8/1/18 6 Inquiry RP alleged that an officer who had been <br />questioning her about her mental health <br />state only did so because of her race. <br />Review of body cam showed that the officer did not appear to <br />make decisions about the incident because of RP's race. RP <br />declined to provide identifying information for follow up. <br />7/30/18 8/13/18 13 Service Level RP was unhappy that no officer was <br />dispatched in a rear end collision. <br />Sgt. spoke with RP about EPD policies in regard to traffic <br />accidents, with no response for non injury accidents. <br />7/31/18 9/6/18 36 Performance RP was unhappy that an officer showed <br />up at the hospital 3 hours after she was <br />assaulted and told her she would be <br />cited if she tried to press charges. <br />Body cam revealed that the officer followed policy in his <br />investigation and the conversation with RP was not as RP <br />explained. Sgt. attempted to speak with RP, who was unhappy <br />with EPD and hung up on the Sgt. <br />7/31/18 9/11/18 41 Performance RP was unhappy that an officer did not <br />cite another driver in which she felt was <br />a road rage issue. <br />Sgt. learned that the officer spoke with both drivers and <br />facilitated an information exchange, but could not cite either <br />driver without witnesses. No policy violations were found. RP <br />did not return voice messages. <br />8/1/18 9/10/18 39 Inquiry RP was upset with an officer who failed <br />to arrest the suspects who had jumped <br />her son, causing a broken jaw. <br />Sgt. reviewed police report and body cams of the incident and <br />found that the officer conducted a through investigation, <br />speaking with RP her son and other witnesses. Camera phone <br />video was found and reviewed. The issue was found to be mutual <br />combat and body cam refuted many of the statements RP made <br />in her allegation. Sgt. spoke with RP about the incident. <br />8/2/18 8/3/18 1 Performance <br />Dismissed: <br />Timeliness <br />RP was unhappy that officer did not <br />allow him to retrieve items from his <br />vehicle that had been towed. <br />Dismissed: Timeliness <br />8/2/18 8/16/18 14 Inquiry RP inquired in to how a restraining order <br />was handled by an officer. <br />Review of body cam showed the officer handled the situation <br />correctly. Sgt. spoke with RP about the findings and provided <br />ideas that might help mitigate the issue she is having. <br />June 19, 2019, Work Session – Item 2