Agenda Packet 6-19-19 Work Session

Home Browse Search

2018 Incident Reviews, Inquiries, Policy Complaints, and Service Complaints Appendix B Page 27 of 48 Received Date Closed Date Time Open (days) Classification Summary Outcome 7/25/18 7/27/18 2 Courtesy Dismissed: Outside Jurisdiction RP reported a Cahoots employee who she felt was rude. Dismissed: Outside Jurisdiction 7/25/18 8/1/18 6 Inquiry RP claimed he was held in the back of a patrol car for an excessive amount of time. Sgt. reviewed body cam of RP in the patrol car and found that he was in the vehicle less than 6 minutes, in the early morning hour, with the vehicle parked in the shade. Temperature was 60 degrees. No policy violation. RP did not return calls. 7/11/18 8/30/18 49 Inquiry RP was unhappy with a conversation she had with officers on a downtown street. Supervisor was with officers at the time of the interaction and found them to be cordial with RP while asking her to be aware of the volume and tone of her songs and the effect it was having on other citizens. No Policy violation. 7/24/18 8/9/18 15 Incident Review Internal complaint that an officer had interfered in another officer's project. Determined to be a performance issue and forwarded to supervisor. 7/28/18 8/13/18 15 Inquiry RP reported that he was threatened with retaliation if he pursued a case in which the officer determined was non-criminal. Body cam review showed the officer being professional and respectful, spending more than two hours investigating RP's complaint, making no threats of retaliation. Sgt. spoke with RP about the findings. 7/26/18 8/1/18 5 Inquiry Dismissed: Timeliness RP spoke at length about issue that had happened in 2009. Dismissed: Timeliness 7/27/18 8/14/18 17 Inquiry RP reported finding an Oregon DOJ website that listed her ex-husband's date of death by a police shooting with a 4 day discrepancy. Investigation of the website found that by Oregon law police agencies must report the incident date of a police deadly use of force, this date was erroneously listed as date of death. RP's ex actually died a few days later in the hospital. The DOJ was notified about the discrepancy. The Auditor's officer notified RP about the findings. 7/30/18 8/30/18 30 Performance RP was unhappy that an officer in charge of his theft case was not returning calls. Sgt. reviewed the case and found that it had been investigated thoroughly by the officer, who found no probable cause to arrest the suspect. Sgt. also learned that the officer had been under the impression that once he had been issued a cell phone he no longer needed to maintain his voice line. Sgt. spoke with RP about the confusion and about the outcome of his case. June 19, 2019, Work Session – Item 2