Laserfiche WebLink
City Manager Carlson reminded the council that it held two work sessions on the topic. Brian <br />Jennisen, Lane Regional Air Pollution Authority (LRAPA) Director, was present to answer <br />questions. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey opened the public hearing. There being no requests from the public to speak, Mayor <br />Torrey closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly asked if a "green" and "yellow" advisory needed to be defined to support <br />enforcement actions. Mr. Jennisen reported that LRAPA had provided definitions of green and <br />yellow advisory to City staff. He said that an exemption for natural gas log lighters was also <br />included to address the concerns previously raised by Councilor Pap~. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey indicated action on the item was scheduled for July 22, 2002. <br /> <br />5.ACTION: Approval of Minutes, Findings, and Recommendations from the Hearings Official <br /> and Adoption of an Ordinance Levying Assessments for Paving, Curbs, and Gutters, <br /> Sidewalks, and Storm Sewers on Ayres Road from Delta Highway to Gilham Road and <br /> on Gilham Road from Ayres Road to Honeywood Street; and Providing an Effective <br /> Date (CONTRACT 2001-26) (JOB #3367) <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey recused himself from the item because of his residence near Ayres Road. Council <br />President Kelly assumed the chair. <br /> <br /> Councilor Pap~, seconded by Councilor Nathanson, moved to approve the <br /> minutes, findings, and recommendations of the Hearings Official of July 1, <br /> 2002. <br /> <br /> Councilor Pap~, seconded by Councilor Fart, moved to continue the item to <br /> September 223, 2002. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap~ said that because the item was contentious and he believed that the issues <br />involved could be resolved, he proposed delaying action. He understood from neighbors that the <br />road was not built as designed and there was considerable puddling on the roadway. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman said that the agenda item summary indicated staff wished to move forward <br />with the project because the interest on the project would accrue to the property owners. She <br />asked if postponement would affect the interest, and if the property owners would expect the City <br />to pay the interest if the council postponed the project. Paul Klope of the Public Works <br />Engineering Division said that interest for the project funding was accruing at the rate of <br />approximately $2,000 monthly, and that was allocated to the City and involved property owners on <br />a pro rated basis. The property owners would pay a quarter of the interest costs based on the <br />proportion of the assessment costs of approximately $236,000 to the City for the project of about <br />$1 million during the delay, unless the City assumed that cost. He said that to this point, the <br />interest had accrued on the straight ratio he mentioned earlier; if the council chose to delay the <br />project and a decision was made to accrue the interest to the property owners, he believed <br />another public hearing would be required because the final assessment amounts would be <br />increased. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman indicated opposition to the motion to table because of Mr. Klope's statements. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 8, 2002 Page 6 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />