Laserfiche WebLink
MovingAhead Spring 2019 Outreach Summary 5 <br />For further insight, the five-point scale was translated to numbers, allowing the packages to be ranked <br />by average score per participant. <br />Package ratings by average score per participant <br />“Works Well” = 5 “Works OK” =4 “Neutral” = 3 “Some Concerns” = 2 “Major Concerns” = 1 <br /> <br />The EmX Package, representing the highest level of investment, had the highest average score. The <br />correlation between investment level and average score was complete, with average scores descending <br />in the same order as investment levels. <br />Open-ended comments about the draft packages <br />appear in Appendix C. <br />Evaluation Criteria <br />Participants were asked <br />to choose five criteria <br />(from among 13) they <br />found most important in <br />evaluating draft <br />packages. Some of the <br />criteria were the same as <br />those used to evaluate <br />corridors in the previous <br />round of outreach and <br />feedback. Others were <br />new, to help assess <br />system-wide benefits. <br />By a clear margin, the <br />most frequently chosen <br />criterion was New <br />Bike/Ped Access and <br />2.29 <br />2.78 <br />3.04 <br />3.07 <br />3.09 <br />Enhanced Corridor <br />Package A <br />Package B <br />Package C <br />EmX <br />146 <br />109 <br />108 <br />101 <br />96 <br />92 <br />70 <br />68 <br />67 <br />64 <br />47 <br />39 <br />38 <br />Bike/Ped <br />Travel Time <br />Ridership Increase <br />Disadvantaged <br />Operating Cost <br />Capital Cost <br />Trees <br />Development <br />Plans <br />Public Support <br />Relocations <br />Acquisitions <br />Parking <br />Evaluation criteria by frequency of choice <br />July 15, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item1