Laserfiche WebLink
MovingAhead Spring 2019 Outreach Summary 7 <br />Evaluation Criteria <br />Participants were asked which five criteria (from <br />among the same 13 used to rate the proposed <br />investment packages) most influenced their <br />package-building. Overall results were nearly the <br />same as for rating draft packages, except that <br />New Bike/Ped Access and Safety Investments <br />held a slimmer lead over its nearest rivals. <br />The packages people built were divided into six <br />levels of investment: <br /> Highest: EmX on all corridors, except EC <br />on MLK <br /> Medium-high: a variety of build choices <br />on up to five corridors <br /> Middle: a variety of build choices on up <br />to four corridors <br /> Medium-low: a variety of build choices <br />on up to three corridors <br /> Low: Enhanced Corridor on all corridors <br /> No-build: No-build on all corridors, or <br />Enhanced Corridor on one corridor <br />Within each level, people named the five evaluation criteria that most influenced their choices: <br />Highest Investment <br /> Bike/Ped: 56 <br /> Ridership: 47 <br /> Travel Time: 43 <br /> Disadvantaged: 35 <br /> Development: 31 <br />Medium-high Investment <br /> Bike/Ped: 41 <br /> Ridership: 33 <br /> Travel Time: 40 <br /> Disadvantaged: 31 <br /> Capital Cost: 27 <br />Middle Investment <br /> Bike/Ped: 24 <br /> Travel Time: 22 <br /> Operating Cost: 25 <br /> Capital Cost: 21 <br /> Ridership and Trees tie: 20 each <br />Medium-low Investment <br /> Capital Cost: 11 <br /> Operating Cost: 9 <br /> Bike/Ped and Trees tie: 6 each <br /> Disadvantaged and Travel Time tie: <br />5 each <br />Low Investment <br /> Operating and Capital Cost tie: 17 each <br /> Relocations: 12 <br /> Acquisitions: 9 <br /> Public Support: 8 <br /> Parking: 7 <br /> <br />Bike/Ped, Ridership, Travel Time and Percent of <br />Investment in Corridors with Higher Level of <br />Disadvantaged Population were named <br />frequently at the higher investment levels, but <br />were supplanted by Operating Cost and Capital <br />Cost at lower investment levels. <br />130 <br />113 <br />106 <br />91 <br />81 <br />78 <br />66 <br />53 <br />52 <br />48 <br />32 <br />28 <br />27 <br />Bike/Ped <br />Travel Time <br />Ridership Increase <br />Disadvantaged <br />Capital Cost <br />Operating Cost <br />Development <br />Public Support <br />Plans <br />Trees <br />Relocations <br />Acquisitions <br />Parking <br />Evaluation criteria by overall frequency chosen <br />July 15, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item1