Laserfiche WebLink
MovingAhead Spring 2019 Outreach Summary 14 <br />Enhanced Corridor and especially Package A drew more expressions of concern than of approval. For <br />Package A, the emphasis on serving low-income areas was a recurring topic of both concern and <br />approval. For both Enhanced Corridor and Package A, frequently expressed concerns include relatively <br />low improvements in travel time, ridership rates, and safety for people walking and biking. <br />For further insight, the five-point scale was translated to numbers, allowing the packages to be ranked <br />by average score per participant. <br />Package ratings by average score per participant <br />“Works Well” = 5 “Works OK” =4 “Neutral” = 3 “Some Concerns” = 2 “Major Concerns” = 1 <br /> <br />The EmX Package, representing the highest level of investment, had the highest average score. The <br />correlation between investment level and average score was complete, with average scores descending <br />in the same order as investment levels. <br /> <br />2.29 <br />2.78 <br />3.04 <br />3.07 <br />3.09 <br />Enhanced Corridor <br />Package A <br />Package B <br />Package C <br />EmX <br />July 15, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item1