Laserfiche WebLink
MovingAhead Spring 2019 Outreach Summary 16 <br />Trends <br /> Nearly one-third of all comments expressed desire for more investment than provided. More <br />than 46 percent of respondents who said they had “major concerns” or “some concerns” listed <br />the need for more investment as a reason. <br /> The perceived return on investment was similarly important for individuals with concerns and <br />for those who thought the package worked well. <br /> A minority of individuals who have concerns about the Enhanced Corridor package stated that <br />they do not want EmX or transit investments. <br />Package A <br />Package rating by number of responses per scale point <br /> <br />Typical Concerns <br /> Capital cost per trip is too high <br /> Need more increase in ridership, reduce travel time, improve safety for bicyclist and pedestrians <br /> Not enough investment to help community / growing community <br /> Need to stop building mass transit projects <br /> Doesn’t encourage using alternative forms of transportation <br /> High cost for low benefits <br /> Doesn’t help people who drive, including at river crossing <br /> Not consistent with big-picture plans <br /> Could isolate disadvantaged populations <br /> Doesn’t help Coburg corridor <br />Typical Support <br /> Good support for disadvantaged (EmX on River Road) <br /> Low impact on property, trees and parking <br />12 <br />31 <br />24 <br />54 <br />67 <br />Works Well Works OK Neutral Some Concerns Major Concerns <br />July 15, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item1