Laserfiche WebLink
Transit CorridorTransit CorridorTransit CorridorTransit CorridorTransit CorridorTransit CorridorTransit CorridorTransit CorridorTransit CorridorTransit CorridorTransit CorridorTransit CorridorTransit CorridorTransit CorridorTransit Corridor <br />DOWNTOWN COREDOWNTOWN COREDOWNTOWN COREDOWNTOWN COREDOWNTOWN COREDOWNTOWN COREDOWNTOWN COREDOWNTOWN COREDOWNTOWN COREDOWNTOWN CORE <br />ParksParksParksParksParksParksParksParksParksParksParksParksParksParksParksParks OfficeOfficeOfficeOfficeOfficeOfficeOfficeOfficeOfficeOfficeOffice <br />IndustryIndustryIndustryIndustry <br />AgriculturalAgricultural <br />Wetlands/RuralWetlands/RuralWetlands/RuralWetlands/RuralWetlands/RuralWetlands/RuralWetlands/RuralWetlands/RuralWetlands/Rural <br />Low DensityLow DensityLow DensityLow DensityLow DensityLow Density <br />AgriculturalAgriculturalAgriculturalAgriculturalAgriculturalAgricultural <br />Community Involvement <br />MovingAhead continues a tradition <br />of proactive public engagement <br />that supported the City’s Envision <br />Eugene process. <br />MovingAhead aspires to implement the collective <br />vision and ideas included in several existing plans, <br />such as Envision Eugene and LTD’s Long-Range <br />Transit Plan. These plans are the culmination of <br />decades of community engagement and input. <br />MovingAhead builds o these plans and continues <br />the community conversation set forth from these <br />earlier e orts. <br />Community involvement for MovingAhead got <br />underway in 2015 with workshops to solicit input that <br />informed the evaluation criteria and explored and <br />identifi ed which corridors should be advanced for <br />further evaluation. During these meetings, the public <br />shared what they knew about important destinations, <br />barriers, desired transportation investments, and <br />the importance of corridor features such as parking, <br />trees, and sidewalks. <br />Feedback from these workshops, an online open <br />house, and other public comments determined the <br />fi ve corridors and the three levels of investment <br />options that have been evaluated in the Alternatives <br />Analysis. <br />For more information about public feedback, refer <br />to Chapter 2 of the Alternative Analysis report: <br />“Outreach and Involvement.” <br />What we heard <br />Public comments have generally encouraged further <br />investment to support walking, bicycling, and taking <br />transit. Corridor-specifi c comments provided detailed <br />information on safety concerns and facility needs <br />within each corridor that were incorporated into the <br />development of each corridor option. <br />“There should be more separation <br />of bike lanes and transit all over to <br />improve safety for all users.” <br />“I have concerns about how access <br />to business will be a ected by transit <br />changes.” <br />“I would like to see improved <br />connectivity between bike lanes and <br />paved paths.” <br />“The addition of EmX lanes is good <br />for Eugene and use will increase with <br />growth.” <br />Project Goals & Community Involvement | 5July 15, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item1