Laserfiche WebLink
<br />May 2019 Investment Package Alternatives MovingAhead <br />12 Supplemental Refinement Report <br />When looking at the criteria without regard for the investment packages, by a clear margin, the most <br />frequently chosen criterion was New Bike/Ped Access and Safety Investments (Figure 2.2). The Bike/Ped <br />criterion was followed by five criteria which were similarly rated: In-Vehicle Transit Travel Time <br />Improvement, Systemwide Annual Ridership Increase, Percent of Investment in Corridors with Higher <br />Level of Disadvantaged Population, and both Cost criteria (Operating and Capital). <br /> <br />Figure 2.2 Top Five Criteria Most Important in Evaluating Proposed Investment Packages <br /> <br />Source: JLA, 2019 <br /> <br /> <br />38 <br />39 <br />47 <br />64 <br />67 <br />68 <br />70 <br />92 <br />96 <br />101 <br />108 <br />109 <br />146 <br />0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 <br />Parking Impacts <br />Acquisitions <br />Business Relocations <br />Public Support <br />Local Plans Consistency <br />Support Development <br />Tree Impacts <br />Capital Cost <br />Operating Cost <br />EJ <br />Ridership Increase <br />Travel Time Improvement <br />Bike / Ped Investments <br />July 15, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item1