Agenda Packet 7-15-19 Work Session

Home Browse Search

MovingAhead Investment Package Alternatives May 2019 Supplemental Refinement Report 13 2.1.2.2 Most Important Criteria by Proposed Investment Package Ratings Enhanced Corridor When looking at the top five criteria most important in evaluating proposed packages based on how the participant rated the Enhanced Corridor Package, the list of most important criteria changes (Table 2.7 and Figure 2.3). For the 70 participants who said that the Enhanced Corridor Package “Works Well” or “Works OK”, the most important criteria were Operating Cost followed by New Bike/Ped Access and Safety Improvements, Capital Cost, Travel Time Improvement, and Percent of Investment in Corridors with Higher Level of Disadvantage Population. For the 95 participants who said that they had “Some Concerns” or “Major Concerns” about the Enhanced Corridor Package, the most important criteria were New Bike / Ped Access and Safety Investments followed by Ridership Increase, Percent of Investment in Corridors with Higher Level of Disadvantage Population, Capital Cost, and Travel Time Improvement. Table 2.7 Top Five Criteria Most Important in Evaluating Proposed Enhanced Corridor Investment Package by Package Rating Works Well / Works OK Some Concerns / Major Concerns Neutral Not Sure Total # Participants 70 95 23 3 191 Operating Cost 14% 8% 11% 0% 10% Capital Cost 12% 9% 10% 17% 10% Travel Time Improvement 9% 9% 12% 17% 10% Ridership Increase 7% 12% 12% 17% 10% Bike / Ped Investments 13% 14% 16% 33% 14% Support Development 7% 7% 2% 0% 6% Tree Impacts 7% 6% 11% 0% 7% Acquisitions 4% 4% 2% 0% 4% Business Relocations 5% 5% 2% 0% 5% Parking Impacts 4% 4% 3% 17% 4% EJ 9% 11% 8% 0% 9% Public Support 6% 6% 6% 0% 6% Local Plans Consistency 5% 7% 8% 0% 6% Source: JLA, 2019 July 15, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item1