Laserfiche WebLink
<br />May 2019 Investment Package Alternatives MovingAhead <br />14 Supplemental Refinement Report <br />Figure 2.3 Top Five Criteria Most Important in Evaluating Proposed Enhanced Corridor <br />Investment Package by Package Rating <br /> <br />Source: JLA, 2019 <br /> <br />Package A <br />When looking at the top five criteria most important in evaluating proposed packages based on how the <br />participant rated Package A, the list of most important criteria changes (Table 2.8 and Figure 2.4). For <br />the 43 participants who said that Package A “Works Well” or “Works OK”, the most important criteria <br />were New Bike/Ped Access and Safety Improvements followed by Operating Cost, Capital Cost, Tree <br />Impacts, Travel Time Improvement, and Percent of Investment in Corridors with Higher Level of <br />Disadvantage Population. For the 121 participants who said that they had “Some Concerns” or “Major <br />Concerns” about Package A, the most important criteria were New Bike / Ped Access and Safety <br />Investments followed by Ridership Increase, Capital Cost, Operating Cost, and Percent of Investment in <br />Corridors with Higher Level of Disadvantage Population. <br /> <br />0 <br />10 <br />20 <br />30 <br />40 <br />50 <br />60 <br /># <br />P <br />a <br />r <br />t <br />i <br />c <br />i <br />p <br />a <br />n <br />t <br />s <br /> <br />Works Well / Works OK Some Concerns / Major Concerns Neutral Not Sure <br />July 15, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item1