Laserfiche WebLink
<br />May 2019 Investment Package Alternatives MovingAhead <br />24 Supplemental Refinement Report <br />2.1.2.4 Most Important Criteria by Level of Investment <br />Community proposed Build-a-Packages were grouped by the total level of investment proposed in the <br />package; Section 2.1.3 provides a more detailed explanation of how the total level of investment was <br />calculated. This method of tabulating investment resulted in five investment groups with the lowest <br />level of investment having a range of 5-7 and the highest level of investment having a range of 21-23. <br />Based on the level of investment groups, the most important criteria to participants who built packages <br />with a lower level of investment (5-7 and 9-11) were Operating and Capital Costs, Business Relocations, <br />Acquisitions, Public Support, Tree Impacts, and New Bike / Ped Access and Safety Investments (Table <br />2.12 and Figure 2.9). Participants who built packages with a moderate level of investment (13-15) were <br />influenced by New Bike / Ped Access and Safety Investments, Travel Time Improvement, Operating and <br />Capital Costs, Ridership Increase, and Tree Impacts. Participants who built packages with high levels of <br />investments (17-19 and 21-23) considered the following criteria most important: New Bike / Ped Access <br />and Safety Investments, Ridership Increase, Travel Time Improvements, Percent of Investment in <br />Corridors with Higher Level of Disadvantage Population, Capital Cost, and Support Development. <br /> <br />Table 2.12 Most Important Criteria by Level of Investment <br /> # Participants Selecting Criteria as Most Important <br />Level of Investment 5-7 9-11 13-15 17-19 21-23 <br />Operating Cost 17 9 21 25 6 <br />Capital Cost 17 11 21 27 4 <br />Travel Time Improvement 3 5 22 40 43 <br />Ridership Increase 3 3 20 33 47 <br />Bike / Ped Investments 2 6 24 41 56 <br />Support Development 0 2 9 23 31 <br />Tree Impacts 6 6 20 9 7 <br />Acquisitions 9 4 12 3 0 <br />Business Relocations 12 5 11 3 0 <br />Parking Impacts 7 2 6 9 2 <br />EJ 1 5 19 31 35 <br />Public Support 8 2 13 16 14 <br />Local Plans Consistency 2 1 4 19 26 <br />Source: JLA, 2019 <br /> <br />July 15, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item1