Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MovingAhead Investment Package Alternatives May 2019 <br /> Supplemental Refinement Report 27 <br />• don't understand why cross town buses are apparently not an option <br />• Keep the River Road station where it is <br />• Safety comes first <br />• Community involvement is great, but you should also share your expertise and reasoning for <br />your preferred option <br />• Come up with a 50 year vision of the transportation system and build slowly toward that vision <br />• Purchase land for turnouts for all bus stops so the buses do not impede traffic <br />Figure 2.10 Community Proposed Build-a-Packages – Same as Proposed vs Variations <br /> <br />Source: JLA, 2019. <br /> <br />The investment packages built by the community were grouped by the total level of investment which <br />was calculated using a scale of 1 – 3 - 5 for each level of investment in each corridor with 1 = No-Build, 3 <br />= Enhanced Corridor, and 5 = EmX. For each corridor proposed, the level of investment in each corridor <br />was assigned a value then totaled for the entire proposed package (see examples in Table 2.13). The <br />level of investment in the community proposed Build-a-Packages ranged from 5 to 21. The level of <br />investment in the original proposed investment packages ranged from 11 to 23 with the Enhanced <br />Corridor Package and Package B both scoring a 15. The Enhanced Corridor Package scores a 15 because <br />it has investments in all five corridors, but the investments are more moderate levels. Package B scores <br />a 15 because it has a mix of high and moderate levels of investment across four corridors. <br /> <br />35% <br />65% <br />Same as Proposed Variations <br />July 15, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item1