My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 7-15-19 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
City Council
>
2019
>
07-15-19
>
Agenda Packet 7-15-19 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2019 4:50:41 PM
Creation date
7/5/2019 4:41:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City_Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
City_Council_Meeting_Type
Work Session
City_Council_Meeting_Date
7/15/2019
City_Council_Effective_Date
7/15/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />May 2019 Investment Package Alternatives MovingAhead <br />46 Supplemental Refinement Report <br />Table A-3 Recommended Corridor Alternatives to be Considered for Investment Packages <br />Based on Technical Analysis <br /> Mode <br />Options <br />Corridor <br />Highway 99 River Road 30th Avenue <br />to LCC Coburg Road MLK, Junior <br />Boulevard <br />No-Build √ √ √ <br />Enhanced <br />Corridor √ √ √ √ √ <br />EmX √ √ √ √ <br />Community Input – Fall 2018 <br />Outreach efforts and the feedback from those efforts are documented in the MovingAhead Outreach <br />Summary (October 2018). This section is a summary of community from fall 2018. <br />Feedback on Criteria <br />Open House attendees were asked to indicate their top five most important criteria. The following figure <br />reflects the number of responses received by each criterion. <br />Participants on the Online Open House were asked to allocate a limited number of points to the <br />evaluation criteria based on what they perceive to be the most important. Figure 2 indicates the number <br />of responses for each criterion. <br />There was considerable agreement regarding the criteria between the online respondents and the open <br />house attendees. The top five rated criteria as rated by the two groups were the same, although the <br />order varied. For both groups, the criteria which consider potential benefits, such as bike/pedestrian <br />investments, transit travel time savings, and ridership, were generally rated as more important than the <br />criteria which consider potential adverse impacts, such as acquisitions, property impacts, or parking and <br />tree loss. Operating cost was deemed to be a more important criterion than capital cost by both online <br />and open house survey respondents. <br />Feedback on Alternatives <br />Feedback on the corridor alternatives was solicited from both the open house attendees and those <br />participating in the online survey. The following is a summary of the feedback received, which is detailed <br />in the 2018 Outreach Summary Report. <br />Highway 99: There is strong support for the build alternatives, with the Enhanced Corridor Alternative <br />rated most favorable. The rating for No-Build was the second lowest for all the corridors. <br />River Road: River Road is the only corridor with EmX rated as the most preferred options. In addition, <br />the No-Build Alternatives was the lowest rated among all the corridors. <br />July 15, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.