Laserfiche WebLink
In response to a question from Councilor Nathanson regarding the rate per thousand dollars of <br />property assessment, Barb Bellamy said the current youth levy was 21.5 cents and acknowledged <br />that the proposed levy would be for 86 cents per $1,000. <br /> <br />Councilor Meisner said he was troubled by the inequities in the levy and the school district's <br />resistance to address those inequities for Eugene residents. He said passing the resolution at the <br />local level enabled the school funding problem, on the State level, to continue which would be <br />against the City's long-term interests. He remarked that he did not expect the legislature to come <br />up with a responsible solution in the next session or the one after it. He said he would not support <br />putting the levy on the ballot. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap~ said a better forum for the issue would have been the Board of County <br />Commissioners or the State Legislature. He said he would support the amended proposal. <br /> <br />Councilor Fart said he would support the motion. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor said she would support the motion. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman said she would support the motion. She said it was not the time or the place <br />for the City of Eugene to get in the middle of the discussion between charter schools and the <br />school districts. She said that the resolution would, at best, buy an additional four years for the <br />students of the district. She expressed a hope that in that time legislators who truly supported the <br />State's schools would be elected. <br /> <br />Councilor Nathanson said she would support the motion. She said the most persuasive argument <br />was that student activities such as music and physical education would be restored, as well as <br />librarians, school nurses, and counselors would not be there except for the proposed funding <br />measure. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey said he supported Governor John Kitzhaber's position on his recent budget vetoes <br />but noted that he also supported overturning the vetoes because the school districts were not <br />equipped to deal with the implications of those vetoes. He said the message behind the veto was <br />the right message and added that the State Legislature had let Oregon's children down by simply <br />walking away from the issue of education. He opined that the State Legislature in 2003 would <br />walk away from the issue again. He expressed a hope that Oregon's citizens would take an <br />example from Eugene's citizens and recognize that it was time for citizens to take the initiative <br />before the voters of Oregon to find an appropriate way to fund education on a sustainable basis. <br />He said he did not believe the two-party system in Salem had the courage to deal with the issue <br />but stressed that the children of the State should not be held responsible for that lack of courage. <br />He urged the council to support the measure. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey said he would spend the following year working with the legislature on ways to fund <br />education. He reiterated that the State Legislature had failed the children of Oregon by walking <br />away from the issue and added that the legislators should be ashamed of themselves. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion passed, 6:2; councilors Rayor and Meisner voting in <br /> opposition. <br /> <br /> Councilor Kelly, seconded by Councilor Pap~, moved to authorize the <br /> expenditure of not more than $5,000 from the General Fund contingency <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council August 12, 2002 Page 9 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />