Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />The commuter tax would be an ongoing revenue source, fluctuating from year to year to <br />Assessment of <br />the extent that there are swings in the number of non-resident workers or their personal <br />Financial <br />income earned within the City. In times of a general economic slowdown, revenue would <br />Stability and <br />drop, then rise again in a recovery. Long-term changes in the distribution of metropolitan <br />Political <br />area urban development, business location decisions and City annexation practices would <br />Feasibility <br /> <br />affect the growth in revenue from a commuter tax. <br />Political feasibility of a commuter tax is difficult to judge since it is a new idea in Oregon. <br />Implementation of a payroll tax or per capita business license fee would be of concern to <br />Eugene employers. A non-resident income tax would potentially be of concern to <br />unincorporated Lane County, Springfield, Junction City and other area cities, since <br />residents of those jurisdictions would be subject to a City of Eugene tax. Eugene residents <br />who work outside the City might be concerned that they would potentially be subject to a <br />commuter tax implemented by another jurisdiction if this type of tax were to come into <br />widespread use in Oregon. Any commuter tax ordinance could be subject to a referendum <br />petition to require a vote, although the people subject to a non-resident income tax would <br />not be able to refer the ordinance. <br /> <br />Potential positive economic effects could offset potential negative economic effects. An <br />Potential <br />example of a possible positive effect is that the revenue from the commuter tax could go <br />Economic <br />to sustain important services and essential infrastructure and facilities within the City of <br />Impacts <br /> <br />Eugene that help maintain livability and a healthy business environment and so preserve <br />jobs. On the other hand, a payroll tax or per capita business license fee would increase the <br />cost of doing business within Eugene, possibly having a negative effect on business <br />location decision. A non-resident income tax would decrease non-resident workers’ <br />disposable income, some of which is spent in Eugene. <br /> <br />A commuter tax would provide ongoing revenue to help fund ongoing City services, <br />Consistency with <br />consistent with City policy and would serve to further diversify revenue sources. <br />Council Goals <br />and Policies <br /> <br /> <br />Other A number of jurisdictions across the nation impose a commuter tax or fee, typically in <br />Jurisdiction conjunction with a parallel tax on residents. These include Philadelphia, Los Angeles, San <br />ExperiencesFrancisco, Chicago, Kansas City, Pittsburgh and others. New York City had a commuter <br /> <br />tax until 1999 and is now considering re-establishing it. Washington D.C. has asked <br />Congress to permit collection of a commuter tax. Seattle has recently adopted a <br />commuter tax in the form of a per-capita business fee of $25 on non-resident workers, <br />with a parallel per capita tax on resident workers, to be collected starting in July, 2007. <br /> <br /> <br /> 3 <br />