Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Commuter Tax <br /> <br /> <br />Estimated Rough estimates of gross revenue yields for the City of Eugene may be as follows for <br />Revenue Yield, each method applied to non-residents only. If parallel taxes were applied to residents <br />Administration/along with the commuter tax the revenue would be approximately doubled. <br />Enforcement <br /> <br />1.Approximately $3.8 million per 0.25% tax rate applied to non-resident payroll. <br />Costs <br /> <br /> <br />2.Approximately $2.5 million per 0.25% tax rate on non-resident personal income. <br /> <br />3.Approximately $1 million for each $25 annual per capita non-resident business <br />license fee imposed. <br />Administration and enforcement mechanisms and costs are as yet undetermined and will <br />vary for each method. Currently the State of Oregon Department of Revenue (DOR) <br />collects a payroll tax on behalf of Lane Transit District, at a cost to LTD of about <br />$300,000 per year. However the LTD payroll tax is not based upon place of residence of <br />the workers, and furthermore is governed by state statutes specific to transit districts. <br />State statutes require the DOR to collect the tax on behalf of LTD. In recent years the <br />DOR collected an income tax for Multnomah County under existing statutes permitting <br />such an arrangement, but the tax was based upon total taxable income of the taxpayer, <br />rather than where a portion of personal income was earned. <br />It is an open question as to whether the DOR would administer and collect a payroll or <br />personal income commuter tax on behalf of the City. The City would most likely have to <br />administer and enforce a business privilege fee itself, probably requiring the addition of up <br />to several FTE. It may be reasonable to assume that, depending on the method used, <br />administration and enforcement of a commuter tax would cost the City something in the <br />range of $300,000 to $500,000 a year. <br /> <br /> <br />Legal Authority <br />The City Attorney is reviewing the City’s legal authority to establish a tax or fee solely on <br />and Restrictions <br />non-residents and restrictions, if any, on the use of proceeds from a commuter tax. <br />on Use <br /> <br /> <br />Incidence (who This depends on the method used for a commuter tax. <br />pays?) <br /> <br /> <br />1.Employers located in Eugene who employ non-resident workers would be liable <br />for the employer payroll tax or per capita business license fee. <br /> <br />2.Individuals who live outside but who earn income within the City would be liable <br />for a non-resident personal income tax. <br /> <br />Fairness/Equity A commuter tax is based on the idea that non-residents who work in the City should be <br />Issuestaxed so they contribute a share of tax revenue towards the cost of services from which <br /> <br />they benefit. Using this as a basis, potential equity issues are as follows. <br /> <br />1.Employers within the City are already subject to property taxes, unless exempt by <br />state law, and also generally pay the City’s fuel taxes. A commuter payroll tax or a <br />per capita business license fee would also be paid by employers and would in all <br />likelihood not be passed on exclusively to non-resident workers. <br /> <br />2.An income tax on non-residents would directly tax workers who commute to <br />Eugene and who do not pay Eugene property taxes. These workers do pay City <br />motor vehicle fuel taxes to the extent that they buy their gas within the City limits. <br />If the revenue helps fund services that benefit commuters, then this method is <br />more likely to advance fairness or equity than the other methods. <br /> <br /> 2 <br /> <br />