Laserfiche WebLink
Appendix B <br />Summary of Transportation Service System Needs <br />The following is a preliminary list of transportation system needs and the associated funding gaps. Cost <br />estimates are preliminary. The list is not in priority order but by magnitude of identified funding need. <br />Preservation and Maintenance <br />The proposed FY02/FY07 Capital ImprovementProgram (CIP) will have no monies allocated for capital <br />rehabilitation and reconstruction of the street network due to the dire condition of the Road Fund. The need <br />includes an ongoing annual preservation program to maintain road conditionsat the current level, plus a multi- <br />year accelerated preservation program to address an estimated $53 million backlog of rehabilitation and <br />reconstruction projects. According to the Pavement Management System, approximately 16.1 miles of roads <br />have deteriorated to the point of needing replacement, while 20.8 miles of roads need other preservation <br />treatments. Further failure to fund the preservation and maintenance of the system will escalate these values <br />since the cost of scheduled preservation is far less than the cost of replacement. As the system continues to age, <br />and maintenance is postponed, more and more of the system will deteriorate to the point of needing <br />reconstruction. <br />Estimated funding gaps:$3.2 million per year for ongoing preservation <br />$5.3 million per year for 10 years to address project backlog <br />Traffic Calming <br />To accomplish the goals of Transplan and to meet the expectations of the community, a funding source is <br />necessary to supporta sustainable traffic calming capital program.At present, little or no Road Fund dollars are <br />available to respond to this demand. <br />Estimated funding gap:$400,000 per year <br />Sidewalk System <br />In 1993, Council adopteda sidewalk improvementprogram that was intended to complete the sidewalk systemin <br />priority areas of the community over a 20-year period. The initial three-yearprogram began in 1994. In 1999, <br />the second phase of the program was presented but the plan was tabled due to a shortage of funds in the Road <br />Fund for the non-assessable project costs and the high cost to property owners for assessments. <br />Estimated funding gap:$300,000 per year <br />Off-Street Bicycle System <br />The preservation and maintenance of the off-street bicycle system is funded through the General Fund since ORS <br />prohibits the use of Road Fund resources for this purpose. There are 28 miles of off-street bike paths to preserve <br />and maintain.The General Fund Capital program is not adequate at the current allocation of $20,000 per year. <br />The annual allocation should be increased to address both the system preservation needs as well as the on-going <br />maintenance of the new portions of the system being added to respond to growth (primarily funded through <br />Transportation SDCs). In addition, several miles of the existing systemneed replacement. <br />Estimated funding gaps:$300,000 per year for six years for system rehabilitation <br />$125,000 per year for system preservation <br />Street Assessments and Subsidy Program <br />Overthe last three years, staff and the Council have been reviewing street assessment policies in an effort to <br />address property owner concerns (primarily cost) and equity issues. That effort ultimately will require additional <br />funds for the new elements of City cost associated with local improvement district projects (increased City share <br />for the cost of constructing arterial and collector streets).In addition, the City currently has a three-tiered street <br />subsidy program for low-income property owners who are faced with street assessments. The subsidy program <br />B1 <br />