Laserfiche WebLink
Expanded Assessment Practices <br />Staff are not aware of instances of this tool being used for subsequent replacement or <br />Fairness/Equity <br />preservation of infrastructure that was previously assessed. If, ultimately, all property <br />Issues <br />owners in the community would be expected to pay a share of a replacement cost for the <br />infrastructure adjacent to their property, then there would be no equity issue. <br />This tool would be politically challenging to implement. The Council subcommittee on <br />Assessment of <br />street improvement financing recently evaluated a street improvement fee concept <br />Financial <br />whereby all property owners adjacent to an unimproved street would pay a fee that would <br />Stability and <br />be consistent with their share of improvement costs. Council reviewed the proposal and <br />Political <br />chose not to support it. Local residential unimproved streets are currently improved <br />Feasibility <br />through an LID only when a majority of the property owners support an improvement. <br />Arterial/collector street LIDs are generally initiated by Council. If Council chose to <br />expand the use of assessments, they would need to also address the improvements of <br />unimproved local streets if this approach were to be viable. One can assume that this <br />approach would not generate a stable revenue source. <br />Generally, the City provides 10-year financing to property owners for the assessable <br />Potential <br />costs. If an expanded use of assessments were to be used, Council would need to <br />Economic <br />consider such issues as whether the current financing terms offered would be adequate to <br />Impacts <br />meet the owners? needs, the likelihood of foreclosure given there would be a lien against <br />the property, and the frequency at which a property might be reassessed and face another <br />long-term debt. <br />This approach would not be consistent with current policy and long-term practice. It <br />Consistency <br />would not be consistent with the Council goal regarding affordable housing. However, it <br />with Council <br />would provide for safe and efficient infrastructure, consistent with another Council goal. <br />Goals and <br />Policies <br />Staff is unaware of any other jurisdiction in Oregon that uses this approach. LIDs are <br />Other <br />common but have been primarily focused on upgrading an unimproved street to urban <br />Jurisdiction <br />standards. Another broad based approach of using an LID to provide infrastructure to a <br />Experiences <br />large geographic area was the extension and assessment of wastewater services to River <br />Road and Santa Clara. <br />I2 <br />