Laserfiche WebLink
Motor Fuel Tax Imposed on Distributors/Dealers <br />Cities have home rule authority to levy a motor vehicle fuel tax, and Council could impose the <br />Legal Authority <br />tax by ordinance, under powers granted in the City Charter. Counsel has advised us of the <br />and Restrictions <br />following limitations around the City?s ability to tax motor vehicle fuel distributors: <br />on Use <br />Due to constitutional limitations, the City would likely be unable to tax fuel distributed <br />< <br />outside of its jurisdiction. <br />Although the City can tax sales of fuel that occur inside its limits, it cannot tax sales that <br />< <br />occur outside its limits. <br />The Oregon Constitution forbids the City from imposing a tax based solely on <br />< <br />geographic location. Therefore, the City could not legally impose a tax solely on sales <br />to customers located outside of the limits. <br />The City?s authority to tax is confined within its territorial boundaries. If a distributor?s <br />< <br />facility is outside the City limits, then it has no ?nexus? or connection with the City that <br />would justify its taxing of either the facility or transactions occurring at that facility. <br />A tax on fuel storage may be an option that would serve the City?s needs, should further <br />< <br />analysis of such a tax be desired. <br />Additionally, Article IX, Section 3a of the Oregon Constitution imposes restrictions on the use <br />of the tax, in that it provides that revenue from gas and other vehicle-related taxes may be used <br />only ?for the construction, reconstruction, improvement, repair, maintenance, operation and use <br />of public highways, roads [and] streets.?The strict test is that an expenditure of gas taxes must <br />?primarily and directly facilitate motor vehicle traffic.? In justifying the use of motor vehicle <br />fuel taxes, an expenditure must be used directly for transportation services within the public <br />right-of-way, and there must be a direct and close connection between the expenditure and <br />vehicular use. <br />Although the tax is collected and remitted to the taxing jurisdiction by the distributors and/or <br />Incidence (who <br />retailers, it is ultimately passed through to the motor vehicle owner/operator as a component of <br />pays?) <br />their cost of motor vehicle fuel purchases. This tax would apply to motor fuel purchases by <br />residents as well as by non-residents who commute or do business in Eugene and purchase fuel <br />inside the City limits. <br />A motor vehicle fuel tax is a proportionaltax on a commoditywhich, to some degree, is <br />Fairness/Equity <br />discretionary. In practice, this tax is generally regressive. However, since the use of the tax is <br />Issues <br />statutorily restricted to expenditures which primarily benefit vehicular traffic, it truly is a ?user <br />fee.? <br />This tax would generate funding on a ?pay-as-you-go? basis, rather than providing lump-sum <br />Assessment of <br />funding on the front end of projects. The level of excise tax revenue generated would be subject <br />Financial <br />to fluctuation with changes in consumer consumption patterns for motor vehicle fuel. Growth in <br />Stability and <br />the revenue yield would mirror growth in the volume of fuel sales which, in turn, would reflect <br />Political <br />increased usage of the public roadways. <br />Feasibility <br />This tax failed in six out of six counties in Oregon in the November 1998 election. Survey <br />resultsfroma 1992 Eugene citizen survey indicated that 48% of those surveyed favored this <br />form of tax. <br />I10 <br />