Item B: River Road/Santa Clara Annexation Policy

Home Browse Search

Eugene Code commission and made available to the public upon request. A copy of the report shall be mailed or delivered to the applicant at the time it is delivered to the planning commission. (Section 9.7825, see chart at front of Chapter 9 for legislative history from 2/26/01 through 6/1/02.) 9.7830 Public Hearina Conduct and Procedures. The planning commission shall conduct a public hearing according to the quasi-judicial hearing proceduresinEC 9.7065 Quas.i-Judicial Hearinas... Procedures. (Section 9.7830, see chart at front of Chapter 9 for legislative history from 2/26/01 through 6/1/02.) 9.1835 Crite.ria of ADDfoval.for Annexations.. The pla.nning commission shall review the application and receive pertinent evidence and testimony as to why or how the proposed annexation is consistent with the following criteria: (1) The property is inside the urban growth boundary and annexation would be consistent with adopted plans and policies. (2) Public services and facUities can be provided as prescribed in the Metro Plan or applicable refinement plans. (3) Annexation win result in a boundary in which services can be provided in an orderly, efficient, and timely manner. (Section 9.7835, see chart at front of Chapter 9 for legislative history from 2/26/01 through 611/02.) 9.7840 Criteria of Approval for Chanaesin Zo.ne Concurrent with Annexations. To maintain consistency between zoning and applicable plans and studies, the planning commission may also recommend zone changes for the city council. to consider in conjunction with annexation applications. The planning commission shall review the application and receive pertinent evidence and testimony as to why or how. the proposed change in zone concurrent with an annexation is consistent with the following criteria: (1) The proposed change is consistent with the Metro . Plan . The written text of the Metro Plan shan take precedence over the Metro Plan diagram where apparent conflicts or inconsistencies exist. (2) The proposed zone change is consistent with applicable adopted refinement plans. In the event of inconsistencies between these plans and the Metro Plan, the Metro Plan is the prevailing. document. (3) The uses and density that will be allowed by the proposed ,zone in the location of the proposed change can be served through the orderly extension of key urban facilities and services. (Section 9. 7840, see ohart at front of Chapter 9 for legislative history from 2/26/01 through 6/1/02.) 9.7845 Plannina Commission. Decision. Unless the applicant agrees to a postponement, within 15 days following the close of the record, the planning commission. shall. deny the application or recommend approval to the city council. A recommendation of approval may include modifications. to the original annexation application. If necess.ary, the planning commission shall recommend approval, approval with modifications, or denial of a concurrent change in zoning to the city council. A decision to deny the application shall be supported by adopted findings and conclusions based on .EC 9. 7835 Criteria of Approval for Annexations and , . if applicablef EC 9.7840 Criteria of Approval. for Chanaes in Zone Concurrent with Annexations. (Section 9.7845, see chart at front of Chapter 9 for legislative history from 2/26/01 through 6/1/02.) 9-427 07/14/2006