My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5: Resolution Adopting Amended SDC Methodologies and Rates
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 02/20/07 Public Hearing
>
Item 5: Resolution Adopting Amended SDC Methodologies and Rates
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:53:11 PM
Creation date
2/15/2007 8:30:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/20/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
182
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Methodology Element Two: Develop Cost Basis <br /> <br />The cost basis represents the total costs that the SDCs are intended to recover. .The following <br />methodological issues . were addressed in developing the reimbursement and improvement <br />fee cost bases: <br /> <br />. Existing System Valuation (Reimbursement Fee) -- The method for valuing existing <br />facilities with capacity to serve growth. <br /> <br />--.. <br /> <br />. Existing System Allocation (Reimbursement Fee) - The method for allocating existing <br />system "facility value to growth. <br /> <br />. Pro.ject <;ost Valuation (Improvement Fee) The method for valuing future projects. <br /> <br />. Project Cost Allocation (Improvement Fee) - The method for all~ating future projects <br />to growth. <br /> <br />. Adjustments - Deductions or additions to the cost basis to recognize past or future <br />capital funding methods: <br /> <br />Each issue is discussed below. <br /> <br />Step One · Existing System Valuation <br /> <br />Calculation of the reimbursement fee begins with a review of MWMC's fixed asset records <br />to determine the value of the existing system. The system is valued based on the inflation <br />adjusted original cost approach. Under this approach, the original cost of existing system <br />assets is adjusted by the Engineering News-Record national20-city average Construction Cost <br />Index from the time of construction to estimate current values. The inflation adjusted cost <br />approach recogt}izes appreciation in the system since assets were constructed and assumes <br />that the wastewater system is maintained in perpetuity. <br /> <br />Step Two · Existing System Allocation <br /> <br />The existing system allocation methodology, for use in determining the reimbursem~nt fee <br />cost basis, is a three-step allocation process 1 comprised of the following steps, as illustrated <br />in Figure 2: <br /> <br />R-l. Allocate existing facility costs to facility process components (e.g., primary treatment, <br />secondary treatment)~ <br /> <br />R-2. Allocate costs by component to system capacity parameters (e.g., average flow, peak <br />flow). <br /> <br />R-3. Allocate costs to growth based on estimated C}vailable capacity by service parameter. <br /> <br />The allocation of existing facility costs to facility process components is fairly straight- <br />forward, as most projects relate directly to an individual co~po~ent (e.g., secondary <br />clarifiers are .a part of secondary treatment), or support the entire treatment system (e.g., <br />control systems). Existing facility costs (valued in terms of inflation-adjusted costs) by <br /> <br />1. The numbering of the steps for the existing system allocation process is preceded by an -R- to identify these steps as relating <br />to the Reimbursement Fee calculation. Later processes relating to the Improvement Fee calculation are indicated by an -I" in. <br />the number sequence. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.