Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Measure 37: <br />2. Council asked whether this pending item would be subject to the proposed Measure 37 <br />value-added charge. <br /> <br /> Staff response: If the council approves this Metro Plan amendment and zone change on February 26, <br />2007, the request will be approved before a value-added ordinance is adopted. At the time this question <br />was posed, a draft ordinance was before the council. As the ordinance was drafted, the value-added <br />charge would apply to applications pending when the value-added charge takes effect (normally 30 <br />days after passage), but the charge would not apply to applications that had been approved prior to the <br />effective date of the value-added ordinance. <br /> <br />Trip generation estimates: <br />3. Council asked whether the trip generation estimates provided by the <br />applicant might actually underestimate the potential volume of traffic potentially generated by the <br />proposal, which specific uses were used in the estimates, and whether other uses were more likely. <br /> <br />Staff response: The applicant's estimates assume that allowable uses under a High Density Residential <br />(HDR) designation would likely be ground floor retail with 2 additional floors of residential uses; and <br />that allowable uses under a Commercial designation would likely be ground floor retail with one <br />additional floor of office. These are relatively modest development scenarios. However, staff found <br />that these are reasonable assumptions, given site characteristics and the land uses most likely to occur <br />on the site. <br /> <br />In the applicant's assumptions of development scenarios, the most likely retail uses to occur are <br />"specialty retail uses." The definitions and rates used in these assumptions are based on trip rates from <br />Trip Generation, 7th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The rate <br />used for calculating retail trips is based on the ITE's "Specialty Retail Center” (land use 814) which is <br />described by ITE as follows: “Specialty retail centers are generally small strip shopping centers that <br />contain a variety of retail shops and specialize in quality apparel; hard goods; and services, such as real <br />estate offices, dance studios, florists and small restaurants." A "Shopping Center" (land use 820) is a <br />related use. However, such uses are typically characterized by at least 100,000 square feet of single <br />story gross leasable area. There are also more intensive retail uses that could display higher trip <br />generation characteristics (e.g. fast food, convenience store); however, such uses rely on significant <br />volumes of pass-by traffic. The staff findings (Exhibit A of the ordinance) and the applicant's <br />submittals note the site constraints which limit development of this size and intensity, such as the size <br />of the parcel, its configuration, its relatively isolated location away from major travel corridors, <br />ingress/egress limitations (frequent train service disrupts the High and Pearl Street accesses), and the <br />space requirements for parking, landscaping, etc. Based on this, staff concluded that the applicant's <br />assumptions are reasonable, given the site's characteristics. <br /> <br />In addition, although these are modest development scenarios, the estimated traffic volumes are still <br />high enough to trigger review under E.C. 9.8670, Traffic Impact Analysis Review (TIA). The assumed <br />development scenario under High Density Residential would generate 119 pm peak hour trips, as <br />compared to 155 pm peak hour trips under a Commercial development scenario. One threshold for a <br />TIA is the generation of 100 or more pm peak hour trips. Therefore, both of the applicant's assumed <br />development scenarios reflect the greatest intensity of development that could occur without further <br />City review of traffic impacts. Through the TIA process, the City can require mitigation of impacts to <br />transportation facilities to avoid any reduction in functional classification or performance standards. <br />For these reasons, the change in Metro Plan designation and zoning would not result in levels of traffic <br />that would reduce the functional classification or performance standards of adjacent transportation <br />facilities. <br /> <br />