Laserfiche WebLink
would have been in the absence of the DAC's recommendations. Mr. Scheeland said yes. He <br />believed the measures recommended by the DAC would lead to more local use of the Soreng <br />Theater. He pointed out that the new rental rate ensured that a group selling out the theater <br />would not pay a rent at all while still allowing the City to recover its costs. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said he had attended many of the DAC meetings and wished to commend the work of <br />the DAC. He thought the Hult Center one of the City's most important assets, with both direct <br />benefits from the arts and indirect economic benefits. He highlighted the DAC's recommendations <br />for a governance body (with which he concurred, regretting the loss of several significant <br />committees during a downsizing of the City's committee structure in the early 1990s); its proposed <br />changes to the rate structure, particularly for the Soreng Theater; and its long- and shod-term <br />recommendations for the Cuthbert Amphitheater. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner expressed appreciation to the DAC members. He thought the recommendation to <br />take more advantage of ancillary spaces at the Hult Center made sense, and asked how that <br />might effect the Jacobs Gallery. Would the City operate it and make revenue? Mr. Scheeland <br />clarified that the City's operating agreement for the Jacobs Gallery with the Visual Arts Consortium <br />addressed only the art gallery operation, not the use of the facility itself. He said that the center <br />could pursue the possibility of private use of the space with the consortium. Mr. Scheeland noted <br />that at one time the center allowed weddings in the lobby, but staff cuts led to their elimination. <br />Staff was reconsidering allowing such events at a cost that ensured they generated revenue. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner noted that the information presented indicated the DAC's recommendations gave the <br />center four years of what he termed "good news" until revenues were exceeded by expenses, and <br />asked what would happen then. Mr. Scheeland said that at that time the department would need <br />to consider other options, such as cost savings and additional revenues. He noted that the <br />projections were specific to the recommendations related to the rental rates, and they were <br />conservative in nature. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner liked the suggestion for an ongoing, continuing governance group. He thought the <br />City lost a great deal when it had eliminated many of its advisory groups and had to recreate those <br />groups in some cases. He did not want the committee reorganization of the early 1990s to be <br />considered permanent. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ also commended the work of the DAC. He asked if the DAC had considered contracting <br />all or a portion of the center to the private sector. Mr. Scheeland said that the DAC discussed the <br />possibility of contracting some pads of the center out, although a great deal of that evaluation <br />occurred earlier by another committee. The DAC talked a great deal about contracting <br />concessions, and he noted a national trend toward bringing concessions back in-house after a <br />period of time during which the trend was for contracting. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ asked if staff had surveyed other arts venues in comparably sized cities for their <br />practices. Mr. Johnson said that most similarly sized western cities did not have a performing arts <br />center. He recollected that a previous advisory committee had examined the same issue and <br />reached the same conclusion. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor expressed appreciation for the new rental rates and the fact they enabled local arts <br />groups to use the Soreng Theater. She thought it important to keep arts events affordable for the <br />public. Speaking to that point, she asked why a parking fee was being considered for the Cuthbert <br /> <br /> MINUTE--Eugene City Council February 26, 2001 Page 3 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />