Laserfiche WebLink
portion of the West Eugene Parkway would be part of the charette. Mr. Kelly wanted to ensure <br />that any answer was not arrived at before the process occurred. Mr. Carlson said staff also <br />assumed that the charette would include the modifications the council previously made to the <br />West Eugene Parkway. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Bettman, Mr. Carlson said that staff was asking the OTC to <br />retain the funding currently programmed in the State Transportation Improvement Program for one <br />more year for improvements in the entire corridor, not just Unit lA. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Mr. Meisner, Mr. Carlson said that before inviting other <br />stakeholders, the City would go the OTC and get its concurrence on the steps outlined in the <br />meeting packet. At that time, staff would design the charette and determine the invitees. He <br />thought that key OTC and ODOT staff would be present. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor asked when the charette would occur. Mayor Torrey indicated the date was not fixed. <br />Mr. Carlson envisioned the charette would be an all-day event. <br />Mayor Torrey said that the council would have to determine which four councilors attended the <br />charette as five or more councilors constituted a quorum. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly expressed appreciation for the flexibility shown by ODOT and the OTC. He envisioned <br />that part of the ultimate solution would be a road project but other techniques such as Bus Rapid <br />Transit, commuter rail, land use, and transportation demand management would also be part of <br />the solution. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson considered the charette to be an intensive project that would depend on expert <br />judgment and skill rather than a time for political posturing. She questioned what she could add <br />as a councilor to that effort. She believed that staff had heard the input and concerns of the <br />council. She thought it good if the council could be present to observe, but she had not planned <br />on being there to help design a project or discuss potential changes to zoning maps. <br /> <br />Mr. Rayor thanked staff for the clear and understandable meeting packet material and for putting <br />together the proposal. He suggested the charette be video-taped. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman indicated she was interested in attending the charette. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner supported the motion and was enthusiastic about it. He said the charette was an <br />incredibly ambitious exercise. <br /> <br /> The motion passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 10:11 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />James R. Johnson <br />City Manager <br /> <br />(Recorded by Kimberly Young) <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council April 23, 2001 Page 12 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />