Laserfiche WebLink
The council was also joined for the item by EWEB Commissioner Peter Bartel, EWEB General <br />Manger Randy Berggren, Project Manager Debra Wright, and consultant Dale Smith. Mr. Bartel <br />reported that the draft Telecommunications Plan for MetroNet Service was the culmination of 14 <br />months of work that followed the voters' approval of a charter resolution authorizing EWEB to <br />provide telecommunications capability and service. EWEB had been gathering data, doing market <br />surveys, and developing a business pro forma for a universal build-out. He commended the staff <br />assisting the effort. Mr. Bartel said the report in The Register-Guard that EWEB would not <br />pursue telecommunications was inaccurate; however, EWEB had decided against a universal build- <br />out in the first three years, and would instead stage that effort by constructing MetroNet. He said <br />that EWEB commissioners believed the plan was consistent with adopted development objectives: <br /> 1) that the system be or provide for an economically viable system, 2) that it support EWEB's <br />core energy and water business; 3) that it is publicly owned and managed; 4) that it provide <br />universal service; 5) that it will have advanced telecommunications capability; 6) that it will have <br />capacity to provide for multiple providers; 7) that it will have capacity for utility applications; and <br />8) that it will have minimal construction impacts. <br /> <br />Mr. Bartel called attention to the joint resolution of March 2, 2000, and suggested it be modified <br />to allow EWEB to fund MetroNet's construction and implementation. <br /> <br />Ms. Wright provided the council with a presentation regarding the status ofEWEB's MetroNet <br />Project. <br /> <br />Mr. Berggren reported that, since the scheduling of the build-out would be influenced by the direct <br />service providers, the schedule for build-out was not firm at this time. He asked the council to <br />direct City staff to prepare a joint resolution for its consideration, and for that resolution to allow <br />EWEB to use the funding for which it had already received authorization and to give it the ability <br />to negotiate short-term financing without a community vote, with the option of using the electric <br />utility for credit. He anticipated the most that would be at risk beyond the authorized funding was <br />$1.2 million. <br /> <br />Ms. Wright anticipated that under the short-term debt scenario, the revenue generated by the <br />MetroNet system would begin to support the universal build-out in year six. <br /> <br />Ms. Wright reviewed next steps in the process, which included a public hearing followed by action <br />by the board. She hoped the council would receive a draft of the joint resolution in July, with <br />detailed design work to begin in August. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey solicited council comments and questions. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner said that the EWEB recommendation for no public vote bypassed Section 4 of the <br />March 2000 joint resolution, which stated that EWEB shall not incur future indebtedness for <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 25, 2001 Page 8 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />