Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Ramsing explained that the “Neutral” recommendation was because only one item was being added to a <br />long list: “premium efficiency biomass combustion devices” (methane furnaces). Everything else on the list <br />was already in the law. He said while the addition was a good idea, it would have little impact on Eugene. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy said the bill was important in terms of City policy and should be supported. Mr. Pryor asked <br />if there would be any effect on utilities, such as a buyback. Mr. Ramsing was not aware of one; he said <br />there could be a tax credit. Mr. Ramsing said he would send a list of the devices in question, some of which <br />may not yet exist. <br /> <br />? <br /> HB 2273 – Relating to signs; creating new provisions. <br />Recommended Neutral. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman asked if the bill would create a proliferation of signs. Ms. Osborn said the intent was to be <br />more restrictive and bring back Oregon Department of Transportation’s (ODOT’s) ability to do permitting, <br />which they had lost due to a recent judicial ruling. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman moved to change the recommendation to Priority 3 Support. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor ascertained that the bill did not affect local sign codes. Ms. Osborn said it was more of a gesture <br />of support for ODOT. <br /> <br /> Ms. Taylor seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br /> <br />? <br /> SB 354 & SB 419 – Relating to smoking. <br />Recommended Oppose, Support respectively. <br /> <br />Ms. Osborn said the problem with SB 354 was that it repealed the provision that was specific about local <br />jurisdictions; City legislative policy was to retain the ability to be more strict. A second problem with SB <br />354 was its requirement of a ten-foot no-smoking buffer zone around doors and openable windows. Eugene <br />adopted ten feet for privately-owned buildings and 25 feet for publicly-owned buildings. She said SB 419 <br />was not as comprehensive so did not pose the same problems. She added that State Public Health staff said <br />there would be a House bill coming out that may address concerns about home rule. <br /> <br />Regarding SB 354, Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Pryor, moved to change the recommen- <br />dation to Priority 1 Oppose unless amended to exempt local jurisdictions that already had a <br />stricter standard and address the ten versus 25 feet at the entrances. The motion passed <br />unanimously, 3:0. <br /> <br />Regarding SB 419, Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to changed the recom- <br />mendation to Priority 1 Support. The motion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br /> <br />? <br /> HB 2238 – Relating to councils of governments. <br />Recommended to Drop. <br /> <br />Ms. Walston said the bill eliminated the requirement that councils of governments send a copy of their <br />budget to the Department of Revenue. She recommended “Drop” because it saved paper, Lane Council of <br />Governments had already audited, and the bill did not affect the City of Eugene. The audits still had to be <br />done; they would no longer have to be sent to the Department of Revenue. The recommendation was <br />accepted. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Council Committee on Intergovernmental February 6, 2007 Page 7 <br /> Relations <br />