Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the TIA for the proposed plan amendment. Roadways near the development site include Old <br />Coburg Road, classified as a major collector, North Game Farm Road, classified as a minor arterial, <br />Chad Drive, classified as a Major Collector, and Crescent Drive, classified as a minor arterial. <br />These classifications address the planned transportation needs of the surrounding area. The <br />proposed re-designation is not inconsistent with the functional classification of the existing and <br />planned transportation facilities. <br /> <br />The TIA evaluates the current performance of existing facilities and the performance of these <br />facilities as a result of the amendments to re-designate 6.89 acres from Campus Industrial to <br />Medium Density Residential. The TIA provides that the existing designation projects that 256 trips <br />during the afternoon peak hour and 2,389 trips during average daily weekday traffic will be <br />generated by the development site, based on a most reasonable development scenario. Staff have <br />reviewed the analysis and findings in the TIA and concur with the applicant’s conclusions regarding <br />a most reasonable development scenario. “Trip” is defined as a single directional vehicle trip that <br />has one origin and one destination. “Peak hour” is defined as the four highest contiguous 15-minute <br />traffic volume periods. <br /> <br />The TIA further provides that under the proposed land use designation change, and subsequent zone <br />change to R-2 Medium Density Residential, 93 trips during the afternoon peak hour and 974 trips <br />during average daily weekday traffic will be generated by the development. The applicant has <br />provided these findings based on the maximum number of units of 20 units per gross acre, as <br />provided in the Metro Plan. The TIA also provides findings based on the “master site plan”, which <br />is not part of this application, but the applicant indicates this proposal will follow upon successful <br />re-designation of the property. Under the proposed master plan, it is projected that 117 trips during <br />the afternoon peak hour and 1,086 trips during the average daily weekday traffic will be generated <br />by the development. These figures indicate that the re-designation of the subject property from <br />Campus Industrial to Medium Density Residential will result in a reduction in the traffic generated <br />by the subject property. City of Eugene and Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) have <br />concurred that the proposed re-designation will not significantly affect the existing or planned <br />transportation facility. As such, the amendments are consistent with Statewide planning Goal 12. <br /> <br />Old Coburg Road, adjacent to the western boundary of the development site, is currently under <br />Lane County jurisdiction. Referral comments from Lane County Public Works staff indicate that <br />Old Coburg Road is rural in nature and not currently suited for urban development, and that the <br />Transportation Impact Analysis does not address Lane County Chapter 15 requirements. The <br />improvement of Old Coburg is currently a capital improvement project (CIP) called the Chad Drive <br />extension project. This project is slated for construction in the spring/summer of 2008. In the event <br />that the applicant chooses to proceed with development prior to the CIP, the development proposal <br />would trigger City code requirements to review Old Coburg Road for capacity. As also noted by <br />Lane County staff, in the event that Old Coburg Road remains in Lane County jurisdiction at the <br />time a development proposal is submitted for the subject property, Lane County staff would have <br />another opportunity to review a TIA. <br /> <br />This amendment will actually reduce existing potential impacts to the existing and planned <br />transportation facilities. Therefore the proposed change will not result in a significant affect. The <br />proposed amendments are consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 12. <br /> <br /> <br />Preliminary Findings – January 16, 2007 <br />Page 6 <br />