Laserfiche WebLink
5. Comment on impacts of a hospital oriented more toward Coburg Road <br /> than Crescent-what is gained or lost in terms of traffic and land use <br /> impacts? <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly expressed his frustration with the motion. He stressed the importance of giving <br />staff direction on the options that they had created. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey said that the motion was appropriate to the discussion. He verified that staff would <br />have an opportunity to make their presentation. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly commented that he would like to have seen the Planning Commission involved as <br />well, but noted that the process had been driven by time lines other than the City's. He stressed <br />that he supported the hospital's need to expand but added that the issue was where it eventually <br />would expand. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly offered a friendly amendment for item 1 of Councilor Nathanson's motion, which <br />was accepted, to broaden it to deal with other infrastructure, cost, and urban growth boundary <br />pressure impacts. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly offered a friendly amendment to item 2 of Councilor Nathanson's motion, which <br />was accepted, to include typical densities as well as maximum densities and the time line of <br />residential build out. <br /> <br />Councilor Meisner agreed with Councilor Kelly's friendly amendments. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Councilor Meisner regarding whether Councilor Nathanson was <br />ready to eliminate some points from analysis, Councilor Nathanson said that her intent was to <br />keep the proposed study focused to a few areas. <br /> <br />Councilor Nathanson and her second accepted a friendly amendment from Councilor Meisner to <br />ask for a study of ambulance delivery time. <br /> <br />Councilor Meisner also offered a friendly amendment, which was accepted, to see the study <br />include possible impacts to the R-3 and R-4 land supplies. <br /> <br />Councilor Fart raised concern over the possible cost of keeping PeaceHealth in the downtown <br />area. He commented that if PeaceHealth was allowed to relocate where it wished, it would cost <br />the City much less. He stressed the importance of allowing PeaceHealth to keep its options open <br />in north Eugene and added that the council should quit "hamstringing" people who were trying to <br />build in the community. <br /> <br /> Councilor Bettman, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to amend the <br /> motion by separating it into five separate motions. Roll call vote; the <br /> amendment passed unanimously. <br /> <br />Referring to a council decision made the previous week to ask Planning staff to proceed with <br />down zoning the property owned by PeaceHealth, Mayor Torrey said the impact of that decision <br />would make PeaceHealth's ability to develop the site null and void. He believed that action was <br />bad public policy. He added that, in the event the process continued, and the proposal came <br />before the council in ordinance form, he intended to veto that ordinance if adopted by the council. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 9, 2001 Page 8 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />