Laserfiche WebLink
danger from open flames and endorsed the concept of adding prohibitions on smoking to the <br />signs. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor suggested the County be asked to do something about bonfires in the areas under <br />County jurisdiction outside the city limits that could potentially affect Eugene structures. She had <br />seen such a fire the previous year. Deputy Chief Groves clarified that the County did have a <br />burning season; burning was regulated by the different fire districts and Lane Regional Air <br />Pollution Authority and generally required a permit. Ms. Taylor did not think the situation she had <br />witnessed was safe, and wondered if the County could be persuaded to adopt regulations <br />precluding such situations. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said she received a constituent call about a recreational fire used for cooking, and it <br />seemed to her that City Code was ambiguous about the issue. She thought it should be clarified. <br /> Deputy Chief Groves said that the department responded year-round to such calls. In the case <br />of an obvious cooking fire, that was allowed; an obvious bonfire was not. Ms. Taylor thought that <br />the fact cooking was intended did not make the fire less dangerous. Fire Marshal Augsburger <br />indicated that the department's level of response would depend on the size and use of the fire. A <br />small fire on the ground contained by bricks or stones was less dangerous than an open fire. The <br />crews used their best judgment to determine the level of response. <br /> <br />Mr. Rayor shared the concerns expressed by other regarding structure addressing. He asked if <br />the department had communicated with Portland about its experience fighting its recent large fire. <br />Deputy Chief Groves indicated he would contact Portland for its after-incident critique. He noted <br />the inclusion in the meeting packet of two articles from The Oregonian on this story, one regarding <br />the fire command perspective on that fire. Chief Tallon added that the department always worked <br />to take advantage of the lessons learned by other departments. <br /> <br />Mr. Rayor said he had recently witnessed a response to a forest fire in a rural area of Lane County <br />and suggested it would be useful to learn where those responding jurisdictions had their <br />equipment physically located. An Oregon Department of Forestry representative discussed the <br />agency's operations and its coordination with local fire departments. He emphasized the <br />coordination between his agency and the Fire & Emergency Medical Services Department, and <br />said the Oregon Department of Forestry would respond to a south hills fire in cooperation with the <br />local department. Deputy Chief Groves also stressed the level of cooperation and coordination <br />and praised the Oregon Department of Forestry for its invaluable work with the City over the <br />years. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey asked what the fire hazard had been prior to the recent rains. Deputy Chief Groves <br />said the danger had been moderate for some time. He noted he had toured the south hills the <br />previous evening to view conditions, and there was still green on the north sides of the south hills, <br />but he acknowledged that other areas were very dry, primarily those with south and west <br />exposures. <br />Mayor Torrey asked when conditions reached the point that required the City to close areas such <br />as the Ridgeline Trail. Deputy Chief Groves said that had occurred before. During past seasons <br />conditions had reached extreme levels. He anticipated that if the City reached a high hazard <br />level, it could lead to park and path restrictions. Mr. Johnson added that the situation could <br />change in as little as a week; if such closures were necessary, he would take the measure needed <br />to enact them. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council August 29, 2001 Page 4 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />