Laserfiche WebLink
redevelopment of the Hilyard campus by PeaceHealth. He was tentatively prepared to support the <br />substitute motion. Councilor Kelly acknowledged the lack of a legal requirement for a site plan <br />and added he did not feel the need for such a plan at this time. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly expressed disappointment that the hospital had not provided more specific <br />information in the supplemental materials regarding the type of construction anticipated or the jobs <br />to be created. He asked the applicant to prepare a statement that the hospital would be <br />redeveloping the Hilyard campus within a given time period with a rough time line for completion. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor opposed the substitute motion, saying that the application was premature and <br />there was no clear demonstration the vacation was in the public interest. Those currently using the <br />alley would have to go someplace else, and the council needed to consider that. She pointed out <br />that the adjacent market required deliveries and loading and unloading, which necessitated access <br />to the alley. <br /> <br />Councilor Nathanson reminded the council that six months' previous it had been working to get a <br />much larger redevelopment in the area in question, which would have necessitated many, many <br />more significant changes beyond the alley vacation. She said that if the council wanted to see <br />redevelopment, it seemed to be nitpicking an issue it would have been able to easily overcome <br />earlier. <br /> <br />Councilor Nathanson wanted to ensure that certain issues were addressed; she cited the bus stop <br />on Hilyard and the need for Lane Transit District's involvement in the site planning process, and a <br />review of bicycle travel patterns and how bicycle lanes were marked, noting the danger created by <br />an increasing number of bicyclists traveling out of direction in the area. To the extent the vacation <br />redirected some bicycle traffic, she wanted to improve how lanes were marked. Councilor <br />Nathanson was also concerned about sidewalk widths, requesting staff exploration of appropriate <br />sidewalk widths to accommodate additional pedestrian traffic. <br /> <br />Councilor Rayor was also inclined to support the substitute motion. He wanted to ensure that the <br />alternate route was protected, such as by limiting driveways onto East 11th Avenue, that <br />PeaceHealth paid to relocate the utilities in the alley, and that PeaceHealth work with the City and <br />the Lane Transit District on alternative modes on adjacent streets. In response to a question from <br />Councilor Rayor regarding how the vacation request could be modified to address his concerns, <br />Mr. Klein indicated the ordinance adopted by the council approving the vacation could include <br />conditions that stipulated the vacation took effect when the conditions were met. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman indicated she could support an ordinance adopting the vacation with the <br />conditions suggested by herself and other councilors. She wanted reassurance from the <br />Transportation Division that those issues could be addressed. She did not think that pedestrian and <br />bicycle traffic could be routed to East 11th Avenue because of the Bus Rapid Transit route, and <br />said the City needed to determine what was needed to accommodate the changes that would result <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 26, 2001 Page 12 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />