Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Nathanson said that there was time to address the question and expressed the hope <br />that the City Manager would ask Mr. Gordon to report to the council on how Ms. Taylor's request <br />for funding fit in with other funding requests and funding sources. <br /> <br /> Councilor Taylor moved to amend the United Front funding requests to <br /> include funding to purchase the headwaters of Amazon Creek. The motion <br /> failed for lack of a second. <br /> <br />Councilor Lee suggested that staff prepare a memorandum for the Council Committee on <br />Intergovernmental Relations to examine and possibly make a proposal to the council to approve. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion to adopt Item D passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey adjourned the meeting of the City Council and convened a meeting of the Urban <br />Renewal Agency. <br /> <br /> IV. RESOLUTION 1003: ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF THE GENERAL PURPOSE <br /> FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF THE CITY OF <br /> EUGENE, OREGON, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 <br /> <br /> Councilor Meisner moved, seconded by Councilor Nathanson, to adopt <br /> Resolution Number 1003 acknowledging receipt of the general purpose <br /> financial statement of the Urban Renewal Agency for the fiscal year ended <br /> June 30, 1999. Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey adjourned the meeting of the Urban Renewal Agency and reconvened the meeting <br />of the Eugene City Council. <br /> <br /> V. PUBLIC HEARING: PROPOSAL TO CREATE AN ORDINANCE ON TOXIC FEE <br /> STRUCTURE <br /> <br />Glen Potter of the Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department provided a brief review of <br />the issue. He noted that in 1999 the Oregon Court of Appeals issued a decision that the City of <br />Eugene's fee structure supporting the Toxics Right-to-Know Program was based on chemical <br />quantities reported and, as such, was inconsistent with existing State law. He went on to say that <br />in response to the decision, the Toxics Board came before the council in October 1999 with three <br />options. He noted that two of the options involved General Fund support and were not well- <br />received by the council. He said that the third option was sent back to the Toxics Board for <br />consideration of refinements. <br /> <br />Mr. Potter said that the Toxics Board discussed refinements in depth but had ultimately had <br />decided unanimously to send back the same recommendation. He said that the proposal was to <br />assess fees to all Eugene manufacturers with 10 or more employees based on the total number of <br />employees. He said that staff estimated that the proposal would affect more than 100 businesses <br />in addition to the 50 that were already reporting under the current program, and that a fee of <br />approximately $8 per employee would result. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 24, 2000 Page 4 <br /> 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />