Laserfiche WebLink
need for similar programs on a statewide basis. He added that if the vote came to a tie he would <br />support the proposal. <br /> <br />City Manager Johnson pointed out that a motion could be passed waiving the rule or by positive <br />council action the rule would also be waived. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly commented that the ongoing need for funding for the program be recognized and <br />allowed for in future budgeting processes. He reiterated his concern that other requests for <br />funding of fundamental programs had been limited to $5,000. <br /> <br /> Councilor Kelly, seconded by Councilor Meisner, moved to amend the motion <br /> to change the funding amount to $5,000. <br /> <br />Councilor Nathanson commented that it would not be the first time that the council had reduced <br />funding from the amount originally requested. She noted that it was a painful thing to do, but <br />noted that many requests, from equally worthy organizations, had been received and the City was <br />not in a position to fund all of them. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Councilor Nathanson regarding the effects of lowering the funding <br />by $3,000, Ms. Arnold said that the program would keep its doors open as long as funding <br />allowed. She noted that there was money committed from the Human Services Commission and <br />that she was going to ask Springfield for money as well. <br /> <br />Councilor Meisner said that he would support the amendment. He stated his belief that it was <br />possible to find community financial support for the program. He said that community support <br />was essential because a program like the one being discussed needed a formal expression of <br />support from a great many agencies besides the City. He noted that Human Services <br />Commission money came primarily from the City and therefore the City had already indirectly <br />funded the program. He stressed that many contingency requests were just as worthy and their <br />sponsors had been told to come back with a smaller proposal. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor supported the motion to amend. She commented that the City could not afford <br />to fully support every program no matter how worthwhile they were. She reiterated Mayor Torrey's <br />comment that the State legislature should be lobbied to support the program. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap8 expressed his disappointment that the funding for the program did not make it into <br />the normal budgeting process. He stressed that the health centers provided as essential a <br />service as police and fire to the community and said that he would not support the amendment. <br /> <br />Councilor Farr urged the council to remember the people who would not be served if the funding <br />was reduced. He said that it was ludicrous to close the doors early because of $3,000. He said <br />that he would vote against the amendment. <br /> <br /> The vote for the amendment to the main motion resulted in a tie with <br /> councilors PapS, Farr, Rayor, and Lee voting against. The motion to amend <br /> failed as a result of Mayor Torrey's vote against it. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly said that he would support the main motion but called for revisiting the council's <br />Contingency Fund rules. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council May 8, 2000 Page 5 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />