Laserfiche WebLink
In response to a question from Mr. Pryor, Mr. Cushman affirmed that they would have to go through a <br />process of authorization. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Pryor, moved to change the recommendation to ‘Monitor.’ The <br />motion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br /> <br />SB246 <br />Mr. Cushman stated that the way the bill was written the only time an officer or firefighter could use a two- <br />way radio was if he or she was responding to an emergency. <br /> <br />Mr. Jones requested that the Public Works Department be included in the review of the bills related to this <br />type of communication because the department responded to emergency situations at times. <br /> <br />The CCIGR accepted the staff position of ‘Priority 3 Oppose.’ <br /> <br />HB2645 <br />Mr. Cushman explained that this bill was similar to the previous bill. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Pryor, moved to change the recommendation to ‘Priority 3 Op- <br />pose,’ unless the bill could be amended to exclude two-way radios used by public entities. <br /> <br />SB293 <br />Ms. Wilson noted that the CCIGR had voted to change the position to a ‘Priority 2 Support’ with a 2:1 vote. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor indicated he would change his vote to support the position if the bill carried the same amendment <br />to it that the CCIGR had indicated for HB2645 <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor, seconded by Ms. Bettman, moved to support a change in recommendation to ‘Prior- <br />ity 2 Support’ if the bill were amended to exclude two-way radios used by public entities. <br />The motion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br /> <br />SB285 <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to establish a ‘Priority 3 Support’ position. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mr. Pryor, Mr. Cushman explained that bill specified that the situation would <br />have to be one in which the person charged with the offense would have to have a culpable mental state of <br />knowing that he or she had entrusted a minor to a sex offender. <br /> <br />The motion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br /> <br />HB2153 <br />Mr. Cushman clarified that the law would apply to serious sex crimes. The staff recommendation stood. <br /> <br />HB2298 <br />Mr. Cushman explained that “possession by consumption” meant that someone who had partaken of a drug <br />but did not have it on their person was still considered to be in possession of said drug. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Council Committee on Intergovernmental February 13, 2007 Page 6 <br /> Relations <br /> <br />